Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Post-Graduate Residents of Neurosciences - A Nationwide Analysis from Pakistan
Haseeb Mehmood Qadri,Raana Shahid,Shahar Bano Fatima,Neha Naveed,Ahtesham Khizar,Siraj Ul Haq,Zubair Mustafa Khan,Asif Bashir,Arham Amir Khawaja,Faizullah Khan,Abdul Ali,Zeeshan Ullah,Ejaz Rao,Muhammad Yasir Basir,Ismaeel Khalid Iqbal,Farhat Abbas,Muhammad Jawad Amin Malik,Junaid Nawaz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.12(pins).11116
2024-11-29
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Abstract:Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude and perception of post-graduate residents of neurosciences towards research ethics (RE) and research ethics committees (RECs). Methods: This prospective cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted by the Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, targeting post-graduate neuroscience residents throughout Pakistan during January and February, 2024. An English-language general questionnaire, designed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of RE and RECs, was adapted to reflect local conditions. The collected responses were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to determine measures of central tendency, percentages, and frequencies. Results: Out of 241 residents, 64.3% were males. Sixty-eight percent respondents were from neurosurgery and 32% were from the field of neurology. Approximately 47% responses were from the province of Punjab. More than half (51.5%) of participants acknowledged the existence of a REC within their institution. A similar proportion (52.3%) claimed familiarity with ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects, only a slight majority (48.5%) demonstrated awareness of the specific functions carried out by RECs. Meanwhile, 44.5% expressed concerns that undergoing review by a REC could potentially delay research and pose additional challenges for researchers. Additionally, 27.4% of respondents admitted to considering the fabrication of data or results as acceptable. Conclusion: Our research uncovered a significant correlation between participants' perceptions of RE and RECs and their comprehension of ethical principles. These findings indicate that medical postgraduates with a deeper understanding or awareness of research ethics principles and RECs tend to hold more robust attitudes toward these aspects. List of Abbreviations: AAHRPP: Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Program, DME: Department of Medical Education, DRAP-CSC: Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan-Clinical Studies Committee, FCPS: Fellow of College of Physicians and Surgeons, IRBs: Institutional Review Boards, LMICs: Low-Middle-Income Countries, MCQs: Multiple Choice Questions, MD: Master of Medicine, MS: Master of Surgery, NBC-REC: National Bioethics Committee-Research Ethics Committee, PMDC: Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, RE: Research Ethics, RECs: Research Ethics Committees, SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.12(PINS).11116 How to cite this: Qadri HM, Shahid R, Fatima SB, Naveed N, Khizar A, Siraj ul Haq, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Perception of Research Ethics and Research Ethics Committees among Post-Graduate Residents of Neurosciences - A Nationwide Analysis from Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(12):S55-S62. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.12(PINS).11116 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
medicine, general & internal