Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to describe the statistical arguments produced by third-grade students (8–9 years old) and to identify the teaching support for collective argumentation in a lesson based on data comparison. A Lesson Study Group researched and planned the lesson around a problem from the official mathematics textbook. Design/methodology/approach From an interpretative perspective, we have analysed the arguments produced by students in a situation where they should give reasons to support or refute some claims based on data analysis. We looked at how some teaching support strategies promoted collective argumentation. Findings The strategies outlined in the lesson plan enabled the teacher to foster collective argumentation, encouraging students to provide reasoning based on data analysis. The lesson plan served as a means of improving the context presented in the textbook, guiding the development of well-structured teaching, and promoting high-quality teaching practices. Research limitations/implications One of the limitations, and future lines of research by the LSG is the deepening of teachers' understanding of the support required for CA in their classrooms so that they can distinguish the components of an argument and their role in and interpretation of the effectiveness of the arguments. In addition, the lesson plan did not consider in depth aspects such as the argumentative processes of the students, nor did it implement specific actions to promote argumentation. Addressing these limitations would be interesting and is necessary, considering that teachers still do not understand the key role of argumentation in learning and that the mastery of CA strategies is still a challenge for initial teacher training and for professional development programs for teachers. Practical implications For research purposes, evidence is presented of the types of teacher support in collective argumentation in a comparative task of two dot plots. For teaching purposes, these types of support can be pointed out within Lesson Study Groups and included in lesson plans, allowing discussions and base-data argumentation. Social implications The research has social implications in civic development, educational inclusion, and adaptation to technological and pandemic changes, with a focus on inferential statistical reasoning and the crucial role of the teacher in facilitating collective argumentation in the online school classroom. Originality/value The study enriches knowledge about the potential of Lesson Study and the possibilities of planned online lessons to develop professional learning on collective argumentation with data, as exemplary teaching practices that should be widely shared.

Collective argumentation in elementary school: an experience of reasoning with data in an online open class

Exploring the Effects of Argument Map-Supported Online Group Debate Activities on College Students' Critical Thinking

Exploring College Students’ Depth and Processing Patterns of Critical Thinking Skills and Their Perception in Argument Map(am)-Supported Online Group Debate Activities

The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation

Argumentation skills mediate the effect of peer argumentation on content knowledge in middle-school students.

Argumentation-Based Learning and P4C Approach: A Seventh-Grade Study on Socio-Scientific Issues

Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: the effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance

Components of collective argumentation in geometric construction tasks

Argumentación de futuros profesores de matemáticas en tareas sobre fracciones mediadas por un sistema de evaluación en línea con feedback automático

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities

Incorporating socioscientific issues into a STEM education course: exploring teacher use of argumentation in SSI and plans for classroom implementation

Discussion Tracker: Supporting Teacher Learning about Students' Collaborative Argumentation in High School Classrooms

Teaching Written Argumentation to High School Students Using Peer Feedback Methods—Case Studies on the Effectiveness of Digital Learning Units in Teacher Professionalization

Mathematical Argumentation Performance of Sixth-Graders in a Chinese Rural Class

The Analysis of Classroom Discourse: Elementary School Science Curricula Advancing Reasoning With Evidence

Exploring young children’s argumentation as a heuristic intertextual practice

An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning

Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education

Pre-setting Stances for Students During Collaborative Argumentation: Parallel Thinking Versus Adversarial Thinking

An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education

Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices