Abstract:Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a highly heterogeneous disease with diverse trajectories and outcomes observed in clinical populations. Understanding this heterogeneity can enable better treatment, prognosis and disease management. Studies to date have mainly used imaging or cognition data and have been limited in terms of data breadth and sample size. Here we examine the clinical heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease patients using electronic health records (EHR) to identify and characterise disease subgroups using multiple clustering methods, identifying clusters which are clinically actionable. Methods We identified AD patients in primary care EHR from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) using a previously validated rule-based phenotyping algorithm. We extracted and included a range of comorbidities, symptoms and demographic features as patient features. We evaluated four different clustering methods (k-means, kernel k-means, affinity propagation and latent class analysis) to cluster Alzheimer’s disease patients. We compared clusters on clinically relevant outcomes and evaluated each method using measures of cluster structure, stability, efficiency of outcome prediction and replicability in external data sets. Results We identified 7,913 AD patients, with a mean age of 82 and 66.2% female. We included 21 features in our analysis. We observed 5, 2, 5 and 6 clusters in k-means, kernel k-means, affinity propagation and latent class analysis respectively. K-means was found to produce the most consistent results based on four evaluative measures. We discovered a consistent cluster found in three of the four methods composed of predominantly female, younger disease onset (43% between ages 42–73) diagnosed with depression and anxiety, with a quicker rate of progression compared to the average across other clusters. Conclusion Each clustering approach produced substantially different clusters and K-Means performed the best out of the four methods based on the four evaluative criteria. However, the consistent appearance of one particular cluster across three of the four methods potentially suggests the presence of a distinct disease subtype that merits further exploration. Our study underlines the variability of the results obtained from different clustering approaches and the importance of systematically evaluating different approaches for identifying disease subtypes in complex EHR.

Optimizing Patient Stratification in Healthcare: A Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for EHR Data

Visual Cluster Analysis in Support of Clinical Decision Intelligence.

Enabling scalable clinical interpretation of ML-based phenotypes using real world data

Simulation-derived best practices for clustering clinical data

Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering and Its Applications to Patient Stratification

Nature-inspired Multiobjective Patient Stratification from Cancer Gene Expression Data

Using Medical Data and Clustering Techniques for a Smart Healthcare System

An Edge-Cloud-Aided Private High-Order Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm in Smart Healthcare.

Unsupervised clustering of longitudinal clinical measurements in electronic health records

Selection of data analytic techniques by using fuzzy AHP TOPSIS from a healthcare perspective

Unique Metric for Health Analysis with Optimization of Clustering Activity and Cross Comparison of Results from Different Approach

Multiobjective Patient Stratification Using Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

Analyzing Multiple Social Determinants of Health Using Different Clustering Methods

A Disease Diagnosis System for Smart Healthcare Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Battle Royale Optimization

Evolutionary Multiobjective Clustering Algorithms with Ensemble for Patient Stratification

SA-PSO-GK++: A New Hybrid Clustering Approach for Analyzing Medical Data

Efficient and scalable patients clustering based on medical big data in cloud platform

Appointment scheduling model in healthcare using clustering algorithms

Longitudinal patient stratification of electronic health records with flexible adjustment for clinical outcomes

Identifying and evaluating clinical subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease in care electronic health records using unsupervised machine learning

Patient Clustering Improves Efficiency of Federated Machine Learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed Electronic Medical Records