Abstract:Background: Health care providers worldwide are rapidly adopting electronic medical record (EMR) systems, replacing paper record-keeping systems. Despite numerous benefits to EMRs, the environmental emissions associated with medical record-keeping are unknown. Given the need for urgent climate action, understanding the carbon footprint of EMRs will assist in decarbonizing their adoption and use. Objective: We aimed to estimate and compare the environmental emissions associated with paper medical record-keeping and its replacement EMR system at a high-volume eye care facility in southern India. Methods: We conducted the life cycle assessment methodology per the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14040 standard, with primary data supplied by the eye care facility. Data on the paper record-keeping system include the production, use, and disposal of paper and writing utensils in 2016. The EMR system was adopted at this location in 2018. Data on the EMR system include the allocated production and disposal of capital equipment (such as computers and routers); the production, use, and disposal of consumable goods like paper and writing utensils; and the electricity required to run the EMR system. We excluded built infrastructure and cooling loads (eg. buildings and ventilation) from both systems. We used sensitivity analyses to model the effects of practice variation and data uncertainty and Monte Carlo assessments to statistically compare the 2 systems, with and without renewable electricity sources. Results: This location's EMR system was found to emit substantially more greenhouse gases (GHGs) than their paper medical record system (195,000 kg carbon dioxide equivalents [CO 2 e] per year or 0.361 kg CO 2 e per patient visit compared with 20,800 kg CO 2 e per year or 0.037 kg CO 2 e per patient). However, sensitivity analyses show that the effect of electricity sources is a major factor in determining which record-keeping system emits fewer GHGs. If the study hospital sourced all electricity from renewable sources such as solar or wind power rather than the Indian electric grid, their EMR emissions would drop to 24,900 kg CO 2 e (0.046 kg CO 2 e per patient), a level comparable to the paper record-keeping system. Energy-efficient EMR equipment (such as computers and monitors) is the next largest factor impacting emissions, followed by equipment life spans. Multimedia Appendix 1 includes other emissions impact categories. Conclusions: The climate-changing emissions associated with an EMR system are heavily dependent on the sources of electricity. With a decarbonized electricity source, the EMR system's GHG emissions are on par with paper medical record-keeping, and decarbonized grids would likely have a much broader benefit to society. Though we found that the EMR system produced more emissions than a paper record-keeping system, this study does not account for potential expanded environmental gains from EMRs, including expanding access to care while reducing patient travel and operational efficiencies that can reduce unnecessary or redundant care. Trial Registration:

A computer-based patient record: Emory's approach

An Electronic Medical Record System with Treatment Recommendations Based on Patient Similarity.

Selected impressions on the beginning of the electronic medical record and patient information

‘Trying to find information is like hating yourself every day’: The collision of electronic information systems in transition with patients in transition

Transitioning from a computerized provider order entry and paper documentation system to an electronic health record: expectations and experiences of hospital staff

Anesthesia Information Management Systems: Evolution of the Paper Anesthetic Record to a Multisystem Electronic Medical Record Network That Streamlines Perioperative Care

Implement of Outpatient and Emergency Electronic Medical Records in a Hospital

Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review

Allied health professionals' experiences and lessons learned in response to a big bang electronic medical record implementation: A prospective observational study

The use of automated ambulatory medical records

Multidisciplinary user experience of a newly implemented electronic patient record in Ireland: An exploratory qualitative study

Attitudes toward inter-hospital electronic patient record exchange: discrepancies among physicians, medical record staff, and patients

The personal health record: consumers banking on their health

Foundations for an Electronic Medical Record

Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.

Patient-centered documentation: an effective and efficient use of clinical information systems

Barriers to Medical Students' Electronic Health Record Access Can Impede Their Preparedness for Practice

The Environmental Impacts of Electronic Medical Records Versus Paper Records at a Large Eye Hospital in India: Life Cycle Assessment Study

Ethereum blockchain for electronic health records: securing and streamlining patient management

Clinician and staff experiences with frustrated patients during an electronic health record transition: a qualitative case study

Development, implementation and benefits of a rheumatology-specific electronic medical record application with automated display of outcome measures