552 Pain in the Assessment: Improving Reassessment of Burn Patients in the Emergency Department

Stacey Richerbach,Jenny Granger,Tiffany Hockenberry,Karen J Richey,Kevin N Foster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae036.186

2024-04-17

Journal of Burn Care & Research

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Treatment of burn patients in the emergency department (ED) is challenging and often complicated by excruciating pain sparked by the burn injury. Unmanaged burn pain causes undue stress to the patient, both mentally and physically, and may result in physiologic manifestations. The physiologic impact of extreme burn pain may convolute a provider’s assessment and priorities of care. To facilitate appropriate treatment, RNs in the ED must perform timely pain reassessments. Our institutional benchmark for pain reassessment following medication administration is 90%. In 2021, we observed a drop in compliance in the ED to 73% and instituted a multidisciplinary, quality improvement (QI) approach to improve pain reassessment. The purposes of this project were to pinpoint education needs of nursing staff, improve compliance of pain reassessment, and to evaluate the efficacy of our interventions. Methods A survey was disseminated to Burn ED nursing staff to identify barriers to pain reassessment. QI interventions included a collaboration between Nursing, Informatics, and Quality Assurance to overcome barriers related to education, optimization of documentation in the electronic health record (EHR), and timely performance feedback. Education was disseminated via pre-shift nursing huddle, weekly newsletters, and educational posters. Modifications were made to the EHR software to alert nurses to reassessment needs and accounted for medication ‘indication.’ Quality Assurance increased report frequency to furnish reports weekly instead of monthly, enabling nursing leadership to expedite individualized feedback and education. Feedback was well-received by staff. Reassessment metrics were added to the quality board and posted in staff lounges. Top performers were acknowledged monthly in the department newsletter’s ‘Benchmark Brief.’ Performance was analyzed from April 2021 through June 2023, and was grouped quarterly. Results Following initiation of the QI project, pain reassessment increased by 18.8% to a 93.6% rate of timely reassessment. Conclusions Our multidisciplinary quality improvement project was successful, increasing complete and timely pain reassessment in the ED by 18.8%. Further, we discovered the need to reinforce education related to medication administration route, as PO medications had a higher incidence of pain reassessment non-compliance. To reduce the limitations of staff education, we continue to work with Informatics and the EHR vendor to refine the use of technology and better facilitate reassessment. Applicability of Research to Practice Further research is needed to evaluate efficacy of education related to pain reassessment following PO medication administration.

dermatology,surgery,critical care medicine

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

#### First paper: Improvement of pain re - assessment in burn patients in the emergency department

**Background and problems**:
Treating burn patients in the emergency department (ED) is challenging, mainly due to the severe pain caused by burns. Unmanaged burn pain will not only bring great psychological and physiological stress to patients, but may also lead to changes in physiological manifestations, thus affecting doctors' assessment and nursing priorities. To ensure appropriate treatment, emergency department nurses must conduct pain re - assessment in a timely manner. However, in 2021, the compliance rate of pain re - assessment in this institution dropped from 90% to 73%, so multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) measures need to be taken to improve the compliance of pain re - assessment.

**Research objectives**:
1. Determine the educational needs of nursing staff in pain re - assessment.
2. Improve the compliance of pain re - assessment.
3. Evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions taken.

#### Second paper: Nursing - led education and intervention to reduce the fungal infection rate in the burn ward

**Background and problems**:
Fungal infections pose a significant complication risk to patients with a hospital stay of more than seven days and a large burn area. According to the standards of this burn ward, patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) greater than 20% in adults or greater than 15% in children need isolation precautions. Fungal infections will increase the patient's hospital stay, risk of death, risk of sepsis and risk of skin graft failure. Currently, there is limited research on how to reduce fungal infections in the burn ward through bedside - nursing - led initiatives.

**Research objectives**:
Determine whether policy revisions led by bedside nursing, education generated by nursing staff, and implementation can reduce the fungal infection rate in burn patients who meet the TBSA isolation prevention standards, and compare it with the infection rate before implementation.

These two papers respectively propose quality improvement projects for pain management in burn patients in the emergency department and fungal infection control in the burn ward, aiming to improve nursing quality and patient safety through multidisciplinary cooperation and educational interventions.