Decision-making participation patterns: the role of organizational context

P E Connor

Abstract:Patterns of employees' participation in a number of specific decisions were studied in 101 Oregon nursing homes. The inquiry concerned whether such patterns vary according to the contextual properties of facility size, skill level, and profit-making orientation. Although interaction effects varied, main-effect results were strong.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Nurses' Participation in Clinical and Administrative Decisions in Different Types of Hospital Units

Cynthia Thornton Bacon,Smriti Shrestha,Marjorie Jenkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000731

Abstract:Objective: This study explored the types of decisions and differences in decision making that nurses made in different types of hospital units. Background: The relationship between nurses' participation in decision making and the different types of hospital units where they work is not well understood. Methods: Nurses' participation in decision making was explored using the Participation in Decision Activities Questionnaire. The final sample included 307 nurses in 24 nursing units in 6 hospitals. Results: Nurses overall participated more in clinical than administrative decisions, and there were significant differences based on unit type. Critical care nurses had the highest and general care units the lowest levels of participation in decision making. Conclusions: Nurses in critical care units participated in higher amounts and at higher levels of clinical decisions overall than either intermediate or general care units. Nurse leaders should determine barriers to decision making in general care units and explore mechanisms to increase participation by clinical nurses.
Role-Related Participation in Product Design Teams

Joseph A. Bonito,Joann Keyton,Jennifer N. Ervin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618759

IF: 6.3

2016-07-09

Communication Research

Abstract:Organizations often delegate decision-making tasks to groups and teams. At issue is the extent to which participation during discussion reflects both individual-level characteristics and emergent (i.e., group-level) processes. Drawing upon Hewes’s socio-egocentric model and team meeting literature, we used a multilevel approach to examine participation in product-design teams across a series of tasks. Findings indicate that participation consists of both intra- and group-level processes. Team members who were talkative initially continued to participate frequently during the later tasks, and, as predicted, project managers also spoke more often than team members in any other role. In addition, group-level trends became stronger over time, as evidenced by behavioral convergence. Discussion addresses implications for a “middle ground” approach to modeling communicative behavior in groups.

communication
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLOCATION OF DECISION‐MAKING ACROSS STAKEHOLDER GROUPS: THE CASE OF PERSONAL CARE INDUSTRIES

Avner Ben-Ner,Ting Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00424.x

2010-01-01

Abstract:ABSTRACT**: The article compares the allocation of decision‐making across stakeholder groups in for‐profit, nonprofit and local government personal care facilities in one state in the United States. We analyze detailed survey data on nursing homes, childcare centers and group homes. We find that in comparison to nonprofit and government organizations, for‐profit firms delegate more decision‐making power to executives and owners, and less to their employees, consumers, families, boards of directors, and community representatives. The differences, although generally small, support the hypothesis that decision‐making is allocated to different groups in accord with the broad objectives of the organization.
Ownership and Organization Design: an Empirical Investigation of Nursing Homes

Avner Ben-Ner,Ting Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2012.16873abstract

2012-01-01

Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract:Ownership differences among organizations result in different agency problems and organizational objectives. Organization design accommodates organizational objectives and ameliorates agency problems. We generate hypotheses concerning differences in delegation of decision-making to employees, reliance on different incentives, monitoring and selection of new employees among for-profit (FP), nonprofit (NP) and local government (LG) organizations. We examine empirically organization design in a sample of 105 nursing homes in Minnesota, using data obtained from an original survey. The findings generally support our hypotheses. Compared to FP homes, NP and LG homes delegate more decision-making to their employees, NP monitor them more, NP and LG are more likely to use efficiency wages as an alternative to financial incentives, and NP rely more on social networks as a selection tool of employees. The differences are modest, probably tempered by regulation, market competition and institutional pressures for similarity.
Participation in Decision-Making, Career Development, and Organizational Commitment

Dany Amrul Ichdan,Maryani Maryani,Yuliansyah Yuliansyah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2023.v18.i02.p10

2023-11-20

Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis

Abstract:Employee participation in decision-making is a key factor in an organization's success, significantly influencing career development and organizational commitment. This study underscores the ethical and strategic imperative for management to empower employees in decision-making processes, a vital component of human resource management. Focusing on municipal officers from the Lampung regional province, the research employed a survey method to gather data. Analysis of 70 valid responses using SmartPLS software highlighted the substantial impact of budgetary participation on both career development and organizational commitment. Moreover, the findings revealed a direct correlation between budgetary participation and organizational commitment. Employees involved in budgetary decisions demonstrated greater dedication to fulfilling the organization's objectives. The study emphasizes the significance of involving employees in budgetary decision-making processes, which directly affects career progression and commitment to the organization. Contributing to the expanding body of literature on budgetary participation in the public sector and emerging economies, this research offers insightful implications for organizations and managers aiming to enhance employee engagement and loyalty. Keywords: career development, emerging countries, organizational commitment, participation in decision-making, public sector
Decision-Making by Hierarchies of Discordant Agents

Xiaotie Deng,Christos Papadimitriou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070050096

1997-01-01

Abstract:We study the following decision-making scenario: A linear program is solved by a set of agents arranged hierarchically in a tree, where each agent decides the level of certain variables, and has a distinct objective function, known to all agents. Authority is reflected in two ways: Agents higher in the tree set their variables first; and agents that are siblings in the tree resolve their game by focusing on the Nash equilibrium that is optimum for the agent above them. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for such a hierarchy to be efficient (i.e., to have perfect coordination, to ultimately optimize the objective of the firm). We study problems related to designing a hierarchy (assigning decision makers to positions in the tree) in order to achieve efficiency or otherwise optimize coordination.
Comparing Workplace Organization Design Based on Form of Ownership: Nonprofit, For-Profit, and Local Government

Avner Ben-Ner,Ting Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013512422

2013-01-01

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Abstract:This study offers hypotheses concerning differences in organization design among for-profit (FP), nonprofit (NP), and local government (LG) organizations. We empirically examine design in a sample of 105 Minnesota nursing homes, using data from an original survey. The findings generally support our hypotheses: (a) NP and LG nursing homes delegate more decision-making authority to their nurses than their FP counterparts, (b) NP and LG nurses enjoy greater efficiency wages than their FP counterparts, (c) NP homes rely more on the social networks of their employees to recruit new employees than FP and LG homes, (d) FP tend to use more performance-based incentives than NP and LG, and (e) there is little difference in the extent to which FP, NP, and LG homes monitor their nurses. The differences that we do detect are significant but are probably tempered by regulation, market competition, and institutional pressures for similarity.
Does Organization Ownership Matter? Structure and Performance in For-profit, Nonprofit and Local Government Nursing Homes !

Avner Ben-Ner,Ting Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1125005

2008-01-01

Abstract:We compare the structure and performance of for-profit (FP), nonprofit (NP) and local government (LG) organizations. These organizations differ in their ownership structure, objectives and agency relations. We conjecture that, compared to NP and LG, FP firms (a) delegate less decision-making power to employees, (b) provide more incentives and fewer fringe benefits, (c) monitor less, and (d) rely less on social networks to recruit employees. We also hypothesize that, relative to NP and LG, FP firms (i) are more efficient, (ii) provide similar levels of service elements that observable to their customers, (iii) provide lower levels of less-well observable elements, and (iv) provide less of the relational elements. Differences in structure and performance are likely to be tempered by regulation, market competition and institutional pressures for similarity. We study detailed performance outcomes for all the 369 Minnesota nursing homes included in federal and state datasets, and organization structure for a subsample of 105 homes that responded to our survey. Our empirical investigation generally supports our hypotheses. In particular, we find that FP homes serve more residents than NP and LG, after controlling for quality differences. However, FP homes provide lower quality services on a large array of attributes, especially those that are less observable by nursing home residents and their families. The differences among different types of organization are small, but significant.
Decision-Making Mechanism of Joint Activities for the Elderly and Children in Integrated Welfare Facilities: A Discussion Based on "Motivation-Constraint" Interaction Model

Wenjing Luo,Zhi Qiu,Yurika Yokoyama,Shengyuan Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610424

2022-08-21

Abstract:In China, joint activities for the elderly and children in integrated welfare facilities lack systematic decision procedures. By learning from the "leisure constraint" theory, the study puts forward six influencing indicators of motivation and constraint in the aspects of preliminary coordination, activity space and effect. By using semi-structured interviews and questionnaire surveys analyzed by deviation value computation, the study analyzes the evaluation value of influencing factors in the decision procedure of potential activity cases, where administrators and nurses act as two decision makers. Further, it discusses the decision-making mechanism based on the "motivation-constraint" interaction model. Firstly, it analyzes the dominant forces in the decision procedure, which are "motivation oriented", "negotiation oriented" and "constraint oriented". Secondly, it reveals that administrators and nurses as two decision makers tend to give positive motivation evaluations and deliberative constraints evaluations, respectively. Additionally, it analyzes the decision procedures of activities with distinct feasibility differentiation. Thirdly, it positions the levels of occurrence potential as "should occur", "occurred but should be improved", "potentially could occur" and "hard to occur". Eventually, it analyzes the requirements and potential for joint activities under different service modules, which provides a theoretical foundation for the systematic planning and development of the joint activities.
Does Organization Ownership Matter? Structure and Performance in For-profit, Nonprofit and Local Government Nursing Homes

Avner Ben-Ner,Ting Ren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1125005

2008-01-01

Abstract:We compare the structure and performance of for-profit (FP), nonprofit (NP) and local government (LG) organizations. These organizations differ in their ownership structure, objectives and agency relations. We conjecture that, compared to NP and LG, FP firms (a) delegate less decision-making power to employees, (b) provide more incentives and fewer fringe benefits, (c) monitor less, and (d) rely less on social networks to recruit employees. We also hypothesize that, relative to NP and LG, FP firms (i) are more efficient, (ii) provide similar levels of service elements that observable to their customers, (iii) provide lower levels of less-well observable elements, and (iv) provide less of the relational elements. Differences in structure and performance are likely to be tempered by regulation, market competition and institutional pressures for similarity. We study detailed performance outcomes for all the 369 Minnesota nursing homes included in federal and state datasets, and organization structure for a subsample of 105 homes that responded to our survey. Our empirical investigation generally supports our hypotheses. In particular, we find that FP homes serve more residents than NP and LG, after controlling for quality differences. However, FP homes provide lower quality services on a large array of attributes, especially those that are less observable by nursing home residents and their families. The differences among different types of organization are small, but significant.
Employer involvement in eldercare: an organizational adaptation perspective

J Goodstein

Abstract:Social and demographic changes represent an important environmental challenge to organizations. Recent demographic changes in the United States have increased the potential importance of "eldercare" benefits in the workplace. In this research, I elaborate a number of important organizational and environmental determinants that influence the recognition and interpretation of eldercare issues and relate these considerations to the level of employer involvement in the care of elderly dependents, or eldercare.
AGE DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL NETWORK PREFERENCES: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING

Tess Wild,Corinna Löckenhoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0098

2023-12-01

Innovation in Aging

Abstract:Abstract Many consequential decisions are made in the context of a social network, but it is not clear how lifespan developmental changes may influence the way people integrate others into their decision-making processes. Research shows that, compared to younger adults, older adults perform less exhaustive pre-decisional information searches, have smaller and more close-knit social networks, and place more value on harmonious relationships (e.g., Hess et al., 2015). Drawing on these findings, a pre-registered survey study examined age differences in the size, composition, and utilization of decision-related social networks as well as subjective goals and perceptions regarding joint decisions. An adult lifespan sample (N = 432; M age = 50.9375; SD age = 19.53267, range age = 18-96 years) considered hypothetical decisions involving specific (apartment, car, physician, and insurance plan) and generic (important vs. minor) scenarios. As predicted, linear regressions revealed that compared to younger respondents, older respondents reported that they would consult fewer people fewer times, and they were less likely to recruit distant social partners or professionals (ps<.05). Contrary to predictions, the tendency to prioritize relationship harmony over decision quality was negatively associated with age (p<.05). Further, there was no significant relationship between age and the perceived helpfulness of involving others. Findings remained robust when controlling for scenario type and demographic characteristics (gender, education level, race, income). This indicates that the size, composition, and utilization of decision-related social networks differs by age. Further research is needed to examine potential implications for decision quality and satisfaction.
The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting.

Ellen J. Langer,Judith Rodin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.2.191

IF: 8.46

1976-08-01

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract:A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of enhanced personal responsibility and choice on a group of nursing home residents. It was expected that the debilitated condition of many of the aged residing in institutional settings is, at least in part, a result of living in a virtually decision-free environment and consequently is potentially reversible. Residents who were in the experimental group were given a communication emphasizing their responsibility for themselves, whereas the communication given to a second group stressed the staff's responsibility for them. In addition, to bolster the communication, the former group was given the freedom to make choices and the responsibility of caring for a plant rather than having decisions made and the plant taken care of for them by the staff, as was the case for the latter group. Questionnaire ratings and behavioral measures showed a significant improvement for the experimental group over the comparison group on alertness, active participation, and a general sense of well-being.

psychology, social
Control and participation for employees within geriatric care: Does ownership make a difference?

Chatrine Höckertin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2008-00680

2024-12-06

Work

Abstract:The welfare sector in Sweden has undergone extensive changes during the last 15 years, and private and cooperative actors have entered the public market. In the light of high sick-leave rates, especially in female-dominated professions, it is important to identify factors that can help to improve the working conditions and promote health among employees. The purpose of this study was to compare how two of these factors, participation and control, are perceived by employees in three different forms of ownership: public, cooperative and private. In all, 186 employees working at seven geriatric care institutions with three ownership forms were invited to participate in the study. 82% responded to a questionnaire containing issues related to working conditions, e.g. control and participation. The one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis were used to analyse the findings among the three groups of employees working in public, cooperative or private setting. Results showed that employees in cooperatives experienced more participation than employees working in the public and private sectors in two out of four variables – employee's voice concerning work environment issues and sympathetic response from the manager and decision-making concerning work activities at large. As expected, there were no difference in perceived control between ownership forms, which might be explained by the fact that the work nature in geriatric care is rather regulated, restricted and formalized, regardless of ownership form, resulting in limited freedom over the work situation for the individual employee.

public, environmental & occupational health
Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making

Yi Hu,Yafeng Pan,Xinwei Shi,Qing Cai,Xianchun Li,Xiaojun Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.005

IF: 3.111

2018-03-01

Biological Psychology

Abstract:People engaged in interactive decision making rely on prior decision behaviors by other persons to make new choices and they exhibit inter-brain synchrony between each other. The functional meanings of such inter-brain synchrony, however, remains obscure. In the present study, dyads (15 pairs, all female) played the Prisoner's Dilemma game while their brain activities were recorded simultaneously by electroencephalography (EEG)-based hyperscanning technique. We manipulated the context of the game with higher versus lower cooperation index (HCI vs. LCI) and to each participant, we depicted the interaction as involving either another human partner or a machine (H-H vs. H-M). The results showed a higher cooperation rate and larger theta/alpha-band inter-brain synchrony in condition H-H than in H-M. In the condition H-H, there were larger centrofrontal theta-band and centroparietal alpha-band inter-brain synchrony in tasks set for high cooperation (HCI vs. LCI). Enhanced inter-brain synchrony covaried with increased cooperative choices observed between LCI and HCI. Furthermore, a subjective measure of perceived cooperativeness mediated the relationship between game context and inter-brain synchrony. These findings provide evidence for a role of cooperation on inter-brain synchrony during interactive decision making, and suggest distinct underlying neural processes recruited by cooperation contexts to enable high-level social cognitive processing in decision making.

psychology,behavioral sciences, biological, experimental
What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities

Joy Hammel,Susan Magasi,Allen Heinemann,Gale Whiteneck,Jennifer Bogner,Evelyn Rodriguez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534

Abstract:Purpose: Although participation is an important construct and valued goal, how it is conceptualized, defined and measured varies widely. This qualitative, multi-site study sought to gain an insider perspective from people with disabilities in grounding what participation means, how to characterize it, and the barriers and supports to participation. Method: Sixty-three people self-identifying with diverse disabilities participated in qualitative focus groups across sites. Results: Participants conceptualized participation as a cluster of values that included active and meaningful engagement/being a part of, choice and control, access and opportunity/enfranchisement, personal and societal responsibilities, having an impact and supporting others, and social connection, inclusion and membership. Conclusions: No gold standard for ideal or optimal participation emerged; no one defined set or frequency of activities accounted for 'full' participation. Participants described needing to be free to define and pursue participation on their own terms rather than meeting predetermined societal norms. Participation was viewed as both a right and a responsibility, influenced by and ascribed to the person and to the society. Participation does not occur in a vacuum; the environment dynamically influences participation. Implications of this conceptual framing for assessment, research and systems level change to support participation of people with disabilities are discussed.
Toward a Strategic Perspective of Meeting Participation

Stephenson J. Beck,Emily A. Paskewitz,Joseph A. Allen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231226405

2024-01-24

Organizational Psychology Review

Abstract:Organizational Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. Participation in meetings is a multifaceted process. Meeting members must consider individual and meeting goals when creating their messages, as well as a host of other context and resource factors. The purpose of this essay is to create a framework through which to consider meeting member contributions. Pulling from literature in impression management, resource conservation, and meeting science, the essay introduces a strategic perspective of meeting participation and categorizes five meeting participation types. Implications of this perspective on future meeting research are considered.Plain Language SummaryOver the years, meeting attendance has become a larger and larger portion of employee workload. Meetings are salient locations of work, where group members interact in a way that advances the organizational goal. Since meeting interactions showcase group members' preparation and competence, meeting participation is important not only to the purposes of the group but also to the reputation and credibility of the group members. The theoretical framework in this essay showcases the factors that influence how group members choose to participate in meetings. Group members must balance the need to maintain a good impression during meeting interaction while also weighing how much energy to use given the myriad responsibilities that members must juggled. Different meeting characteristics (e.g., virtual meetings and group size) may influence how members try to maintain good impressions and conserve energy. The intersection of these member goals creates five ways that individuals participate in meetings: full participation, nonparticipation, pretend participation, token legitimacy, and off/on participation. Meeting members may use one or several of these approaches during the course of a meeting, depending on how they balance their impression management and resource conservation goals.

psychology, applied,management
Regulatory fit and systematic exploration in a dynamic decision-making environment.

A. Ross Otto,Arthur B. Markman,Todd M. Gureckis,Bradley C. Love

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018999

2010-01-01

Abstract:This work explores the influence of motivation on choice behavior in a dynamic decision-making environment, where the payoffs from each choice depend on one's recent choice history. Previous research reveals that participants in a regulatory fit exhibit increased levels of exploratory choice and flexible use of multiple strategies over the course of an experiment. The present study placed promotion and prevention-focused participants in a dynamic environment for which optimal performance is facilitated by systematic exploration of the decision space. These participants either gained or lost points with each choice. Our experiment revealed that participants in a regulatory fit were more likely to engage in systematic exploration of the task environment than were participants in a regulatory mismatch and performed more optimally as a result. Implications for contemporary models of human reinforcement learning are discussed.
Does Skin in the Game Matter if You Aren't Playing? Examining Participation in Oregon's Public Employee Health Engagement Model

Bill J Wright,Kristen Dulacki,Jill Rissi,Leslie McBride,Sarah Tran,Natalie Royal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.150120-QUAN-678

Abstract:Purpose: Employers are increasingly exploring health benefits that incentivize lifestyle change for employees. We used early data from an ongoing study of one such model-the Health Engagement Model (HEM), which Oregon implemented for all public employees in 2012-to analyze variation in employee participation and engagement. Design: A survey was designed to assess program engagement, opinions of the program, and self-reported lifestyle changes. Setting: Data were collected in 2012, about 9 months after HEM launched. Subjects: A representative random sample of 4500 state employees served as the study subjects. Measures: Primary measures included whether employees signed up for the program, completed its required activities, and reported making lifestyle changes. Analysis: Logistic regression was used to analyze survey results. Results: Most employees (86%) chose to participate, but there were important socioeconomic differences: some key target populations, including smokers and obese employees, were the least likely to sign up; less educated employees were also less likely to complete program activities. Despite mostly negative opinions of the program, almost half of participants reported making lifestyle changes. Conclusion: Oregon's HEM launch was largely unpopular with employees, but many reported making the desired lifestyle changes. However, some of those the program is most interested in enrolling were the least likely to engage. People involved with implementing similar programs will need to think carefully about how to cultivate broad interest among employees.
Intrachoice Dynamics Shape Social Decisions

Fadong Chen,Zhi Zhu,Qiang Shen,Ian Krajbich,Todd A. Hare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4732

IF: 5.4

2023-03-25

Management Science

Abstract:Do people have well-defined social preferences waiting to be applied when making decisions? Or do they have to construct social decisions on the spot? If the latter, how are those decisions influenced by the way in which information is acquired and evaluated? These temporal dynamics are fundamental to understanding how people trade off selfishness and prosociality in organizations and societies. Here, we investigate how the temporal dynamics of the choice process shape social decisions in three studies using response times and mouse tracking. In the first study, participants made binary decisions in mini-dictator games with and without time constraints. Using mouse trajectories and a starting time drift diffusion model, we find that, regardless of time constraints, selfish participants were delayed in processing others’ payoffs, whereas the opposite was true for prosocial participants. The independent mouse trajectory and computational modeling analyses identified consistent measures of the delay between considering one’s own and others’ payoffs (self-onset delay, SOD). This measure correlated with individual differences in prosociality and predicted heterogeneous effects of time constraints on preferences. We confirmed these results in two additional studies, one a purely behavioral study in which participants made decisions by pressing computer keys, and the other a replication of the mouse-tracking study. Together, these results indicate that people preferentially process either self or others’ payoffs early in the choice process. The intrachoice dynamics are crucial in shaping social preferences and might be manipulated via nudge policies (e.g., manipulating the display order or saliency of self and others’ outcomes) for behavior in managerial or other contexts. This paper was accepted by Yan Chen, behavioral economics and decisions analysis. Funding: F. Chen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71803174 and 72173113]. Z. Zhu acknowledges support from the Ministry of Science and Technology [Grant STI 2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0200409]. Q. Shen acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71971199 and 71942004]. I. Krajbich acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation [Grant 2148982]. This work was also supported by the James McKeen Cattell Fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4732 .

management,operations research & management science

Decision-making participation patterns: the role of organizational context

Nurses' Participation in Clinical and Administrative Decisions in Different Types of Hospital Units

Role-Related Participation in Product Design Teams

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALLOCATION OF DECISION‐MAKING ACROSS STAKEHOLDER GROUPS: THE CASE OF PERSONAL CARE INDUSTRIES

Ownership and Organization Design: an Empirical Investigation of Nursing Homes

Participation in Decision-Making, Career Development, and Organizational Commitment

Decision-Making by Hierarchies of Discordant Agents

Comparing Workplace Organization Design Based on Form of Ownership: Nonprofit, For-Profit, and Local Government

Does Organization Ownership Matter? Structure and Performance in For-profit, Nonprofit and Local Government Nursing Homes !

Decision-Making Mechanism of Joint Activities for the Elderly and Children in Integrated Welfare Facilities: A Discussion Based on "Motivation-Constraint" Interaction Model

Does Organization Ownership Matter? Structure and Performance in For-profit, Nonprofit and Local Government Nursing Homes

Employer involvement in eldercare: an organizational adaptation perspective

AGE DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL NETWORK PREFERENCES: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING

The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting.

Control and participation for employees within geriatric care: Does ownership make a difference?

Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making

What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities

Toward a Strategic Perspective of Meeting Participation

Regulatory fit and systematic exploration in a dynamic decision-making environment.

Does Skin in the Game Matter if You Aren't Playing? Examining Participation in Oregon's Public Employee Health Engagement Model

Intrachoice Dynamics Shape Social Decisions