Abstract:The datasets of large genotyping biobanks and direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies contain many related individuals. Until now, it has been widely accepted that the most distant relationships that can be detected are around fifteen degrees (approximately 8 cousins) and that practical relationship estimates have a ceiling around ten degrees (approximately 5 cousins). However, we show that these assumptions are incorrect and that they are due to a misapplication of relationship estimators. In particular, relationship estimators are applied almost exclusively to putative relatives who have been identified because they share detectable tracts of DNA identically by descent (IBD). However, no existing relationship estimator conditions on the event that two individuals share at least one detectable segment of IBD anywhere in the genome. As a result, the relationship estimates obtained using existing estimators are dramatically biased for distant relationships, inferring all sufficiently distant relationships to be around ten degrees regardless of the depth of the true relationship. Existing relationship estimators are derived under a model that assumes that each pair of related individuals shares a single common ancestor (or mating pair of ancestors). This model breaks down for relationships beyond 10 generations in the past because individuals share many thousands of cryptic common ancestors due to pedigree collapse. We first derive a corrected likelihood that conditions on the event that at least one segment is observed between a pair of putative relatives and we demonstrate that the corrected likelihood largely eliminates the bias in estimates of pairwise relationships and provides a more accurate characterization of the uncertainty in these estimates. We then reformulate the relationship inference problem to account for the fact that individuals share many common ancestors, not just one. We demonstrate that the most distant relationship that can be inferred using IBD may be 100 degrees or more, rather than ten, extending the time-to-common ancestor from approximately 200 years in the past to approximately 1,500 years in the past or more. This dramatic increase in the range of relationship estimators makes it possible to infer relationships whose common ancestors lived before historical events such as European settlement of the Americas and the Transatlantic Slave Trade, and possibly earlier.

Population Structure and Cryptic Relatedness in Genetic Association Studies

Correcting for Cryptic Relatedness in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Correcting for Cryptic Relatedness in Population-Based Association Studies of Continuous Traits

Confounding from Cryptic Relatedness in Haplotype-Based Association Studies.

Unifying approaches from statistical genetics and phylogenetics for mapping phenotypes in structured populations

Association Test Between Haplotypes and Longitudinal Traits in Complex Pedigrees.

Population structure analysis using rare and common functional variants

Robust Relationship Inference in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Testing for differences in polygenic scores in the presence of confounding

Confounding of indirect genetic and epigenetic effects

Interpreting population- and family-based genome-wide association studies in the presence of confounding

Defining Loci in Restriction-Based Reduced Representation Genomic Data from Nonmodel Species: Sources of Bias and Diagnostics for Optimal Clustering

Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations

Estimation of inbreeding and kinship coefficients via latent identity-by-descent states

Disentangling Linkage and Population Structure in Association Mapping

A Sparse Graph-Structured Lasso Mixed Model for Genetic Association with Confounding Correction

Accounting for Population Structure and Phenotypes From Relatives in Association Mapping for Farm Animals: A Simulation Study

Centralized Genomic Control: A Simple Approach Correcting for Population Structures

Understanding the population structure correction regression

Correcting model misspecification in relationship estimates