Abstract:Abstract Background and objectives: Motivated from a study on breast cancer, we consider the problem of evaluating a statistical hypothesis when some model characteristics are potentially non or weakly identifiable from observed data. Such scenarios are common in longitudinal studies for evaluating a covariate effect when dropouts may be informative. The hypothesis related to treatment effects may not be testable nonparametrically, with untestable model restrictions necessary for inference. A popular approach is to assume a finite dimensional model and to fix a minimal set of parameters, called sensitivity parameters, conditional upon which hypothesized parameters are assumed identifiable. These profile models, viewed as a functional of the secondary or sensitivity parameters, form the basis of sensitivity analysis. In the current literature, however, inference regarding significance of the covariates is ad hoc, ignoring that multiple tests are conducted and that the working model may be misspecified. Methods and results: In this paper, we propose conservatively testing the null hypothesis of interest across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic. The test must account for the facts that inferences are carried out simultaneously across the entire range of the sensitivity parameters and that the model may be misspecified under certain values of the sensitivity parameters, as might occur if a nonignorable model is fit, when, in reality, missingness is ignorable. We characterize the limiting distribution of the statistic as a functional of processes in the sensitivity parameters, which involves a careful theoretical analysis of its behavior under model misspecification. In practice, we suggest a simple yet flexible resampling procedure to implement the infimum test as well as to construct confidence bands for simultaneous pointwise tests across all values of the sensitivity parameters. The methodology's practical utility is illustrated in simulations and an analysis of quality-of-life outcomes from a longitudinal study on breast cancer. Interestingly in this example, a covariate effect on cancer outcomes is detected over a wide range of the sensitivity parameter when a Wald test that assumes identifiability fails. Implications and next steps: The key implication of this work is that the hypothesis of interest can be conservatively evaluated across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic over the space of these parameters. A key assumption of this paper is that the working model is finite dimensional although the full specification of distribution of the data is not required. The methodology should be broadly applicable to infinite dimensional models, such as survival models for censored data. This extension is the focus of current research work. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A6.

Confidence bounds for the sensitivity lack of a less specific diagnostic test, without gold standard

EBT: a Statistic Test Identifying Moderate Size of Significant Features with Balanced Power and Precision for Genome-Wide Rate Comparisons

Assessment Of Clostridium Difficile Infections By Quantitative Detection Of Tcdb Toxin By Use Of A Real-Time Cell Analysis System

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Statistics in diagnostic medicine

Comparing the Accuracy of Screening Tests with Verification of Disease Status Restricted to Test Positives

Diagnostic Guidance for C. difficile Infections

Comparison of Two Molecular Methods for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium Difficile.

Applicability of Commercial Multiplex Kit for the Diagnosis Of: a Multicenter Investigation Clostridium Difficile Infections

Clinically Adjudicated Reference Standards for Evaluation of Infectious Diseases Diagnostics

Measuring Diagnostic Test Performance Using Imperfect Reference Tests: A Partial Identification Approach

Statistical inference for diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple comparisons

Interval Estimation for the Difference in Paired Areas under the ROC Curves in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test

On the Estimation of the Proportion of True Recent Infections Using the BED Capture Enzyme Immunoassay

Abstract A6: A Global Sensitivity Test for Evaluating Hypotheses with Non- and Weakly Identifiable Statistical Models: an Application to Breast Cancer Outcomes

Comparison of the STANDARD M10 C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile, and BD MAX Cdiff assays as confirmatory tests in a two-step algorithm for diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infection

All that glitters is not gold: An interpretive framework for diagnostic test evaluation using Ascaris lumbricoides as a conceptual example

Diagnostic yield of repeat sampling with immunoassay, real-time PCR, and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in an epidemic and a non-epidemic setting

On the Statistical Testing Methods for Single Laboratory Validation of Qualitative Microbiological Assays with a Paired Design

Impact of the Reverse Two-Step Algorithm for Clostridioides difficile Testing in the Microbiology Laboratory on Hospitalized Patients

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture