Abstract:In recent years collaborative robots have become major market drivers in industry 5.0, which aims to incorporate them alongside humans in a wide array of settings ranging from welding to rehabilitation. Improving human-machine collaboration entails using computational algorithms that will save processing as well as communication cost. In this study we have constructed an agent that can choose when to cooperate using an optimal strategy. The agent was designed to operate in the context of divergent interest tacit coordination games in which communication between the players is not possible and the payoff is not symmetric. The agent's model was based on a behavioral model that can predict the probability of a player converging on prominent solutions with salient features (e.g., focal points) based on the player's Social Value Orientation (SVO) and the specific game features. The SVO theory pertains to the preferences of decision makers when allocating joint resources between themselves and another player in the context of behavioral game theory. The agent selected stochastically between one of two possible policies, a greedy or a cooperative policy, based on the probability of a player to converge on a focal point. The distribution of the number of points obtained by the autonomous agent incorporating the SVO in the model was better than the results obtained by the human players who played against each other (i.e., the distribution associated with the agent had a higher mean value). Moreover, the distribution of points gained by the agent was better than any of the separate strategies the agent could choose from, namely, always choosing a greedy or a focal point solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to construct an intelligent agent that maximizes its utility by incorporating the belief system of the player in the context of tacit bargaining. This reward-maximizing strategy selection process based on the SVO can also be potentially applied in other human-machine contexts, including multiagent systems.

Social interaction as a heuristic for combinatorial optimization problems

Adaptive Influence Maximization: Adaptability via Nonadaptability

A Social Cognition Model Applied to General Combinatorial Optimization Problem

Bayesian Optimization of Combinatorial Structures

The Impact of Network Structure on Ant Colony Optimization

Addressing The Knapsack Challenge Through Cultural Algorithm Optimization

The surprising little effectiveness of cooperative algorithms in parallel problem solving

Power of human-algorithm collaboration in solving combinatorial optimization problems

From Competition to Complementarity

Equilibrium Seeking of Higher-Order Networks under Facet Cover Constraints

An optimization of cultural algorithm

Culture-area relation in Axelrod's model for culture dissemination

Optimizing Over Serial Dictatorships

An Evolutionary Strategy based on Partial Imitation for Solving Optimization Problems

An Optimization Method for the Complex Network Structure Combination in Collective Behavior

The Axelrod model for the dissemination of culture revisited

Theoretical Perspective of Convergence Complexity of Evolutionary Algorithms Adopting Optimal Mixing

Neural Combinatorial Optimization: a New Player in the Field

Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Collaboratively Learning the Best Option, Using Bounded Memory

Fixation Results for the Two-Feature Axelrod Model with a Variable Number of Opinions