Abstract:Using a set of oscillator strengths and excited-state dipole moments of near full configuration interaction quality determined for small compounds, we benchmark the performances of several single-reference wave function methods [CC2, CCSD, CC3, CCSDT, ADC(2), and ADC(3/2)] and time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) with various functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D). We consider the impact of various gauges (length, velocity, and mixed) and formalisms: equation of motion versus linear response, relaxed versus unrelaxed orbitals, and so forth. Beyond the expected accuracy improvements and a neat decrease of formalism sensitivity when using higher-order wave function methods, the present contribution shows that, for both ADC(2) and CC2, the choice of gauge impacts more significantly the magnitude of the oscillator strengths than the choice of formalism and that CCSD yields a notable improvement on this transition property as compared to CC2. For the excited-state dipole moments, switching on orbital relaxation appreciably improves the accuracy of both ADC(2) and CC2 but has a rather small effect at the CCSD level. Going from ground to excited states, the typical errors on dipole moments for a given method tend to roughly triple. Interestingly, the ADC(3/2) oscillator strengths and dipoles are significantly more accurate than their ADC(2) counterparts, whereas the two models do deliver rather similar absolute errors for transition energies. Concerning TD-DFT, one finds: (i) a rather negligible impact of the gauge on oscillator strengths for all tested functionals (except for M06-2X); (ii) deviations of <i>ca.</i> 0.10 D on ground-state dipoles for all functionals; (iii) strong differences between excited-state dipoles obtained with, on the one hand, B3LYP and PBE0 and, on the other hand, M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97X-D, the latter group being markedly more accurate with the selected basis set; and (iv) the better overall performance of CAM-B3LYP for the two considered excited-state properties. Finally, for all investigated properties, both the accuracy and consistency obtained with the second-order wave function approaches, ADC(2) and CC2, do not clearly outperform those of TD-DFT, hinting that assessing the accuracy of the latter (or selecting a specific functional) on the basis of the results of the former is not systematically a well-settled strategy.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228</a>.Additional reference data for five compounds; raw values for transition energies; oscillator strengths; dipole moments; excited state dipoles; basis set effects for water; and Cartesian coordinates (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01228/suppl_file/ct0c01228_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Performance of W4 theory for spectroscopic constants and electrical properties of small molecules

Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities

Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?

Theoretical Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Quadruple-Bonded Dimolybdenum(II) and Ditungsten(II) Paddlewheel Complexes: Performance of Common Density Functional Theory Methods

W4$Λ$: leveraging $Λ$ coupled cluster for accurate computational thermochemistry approaches

Spectroscopic Constants of Mh and M-2 (m=tl, E113, Bi, E115): Direct Comparisons of Four- and Two-Component Approaches in the Framework of Relativistic Density Functional Theory

Benchmarking TD-DFT and Wave Function Methods for Oscillator Strengths and Excited-State Dipole Moments

W4Λ: Leveraging Λ Coupled-Cluster for Accurate Computational Thermochemistry Approaches

Performance of EOM-CCSD(T)(a)*-Based Quartic Force Fields in Computing Fundamental, Anharmonic Vibrational Frequencies of Molecular Electronically Excited States with Application to the Ã 1 A ′′ State of :CCH 2 (Vinylidene)

Can G4-like Composite Ab Initio Methods Accurately Predict Vibrational Harmonic Frequencies?

W4‐17: A diverse and high‐confidence dataset of atomization energies for benchmarking high‐level electronic structure methods

Post-CCSD(T) corrections to bond distances and vibrational frequencies: the power of $Λ$

The Wigner-Witmer diatomic eigenfunction

Anharmonic force fields and thermodynamic functions using density functional theory

Repartitioned Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory with a Size-Consistent Second-Order Correlation Energy

Simulation of Vibrational Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Second-Order Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory and Configuration Interaction Doubles

Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties from TDOMP2 Theory

Franck-Condon Simulation of Vibrationally-Resolved X-ray Spectra for Diatomic Systems: Validation of Harmonic Approximation and Density Functional Theory

A well-tempered density functional theory of electrons in molecules

Numerical Examination of Performance of Some Exchange-Correlation Functionals for Molecules Containing Heavy Elements

Infrared Spectra of Small Anionic Water Clusters from Density Functional Theory and Wavefunction Theory Calculations