Abstract:The generalized Riemann problem (GRP) scheme for the Euler equations and gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) for the Boltzmann equation are two high resolution shock capturing schemes for fluid simulations. The difference is that one is based on the characteristics of the inviscid Euler equations and their wave interactions, and the other is based on the particle transport and collisions. The similarity between them is that both methods can use identical MUSCL-type initial reconstructions around a cell interface, and the spatial slopes on both sides of a cell interface involve in the gas evolution process and the construction of a time-dependent flux function. Although both methods have been applied successfully to the inviscid compressible flow computations, their performances have never been compared. Since both methods use the same initial reconstruction, any difference is solely coming from different underlying mechanism in their flux evaluation. Therefore, such a comparison is important to help us to understand the correspondence between physical modeling and numerical performances. Since GRP is so faithfully solving the inviscid Euler equations, the comparison can be also used to show the validity of solving the Euler equations itself. The numerical comparison shows that the GRP exhibits a slightly better computational efficiency, and has comparable accuracy with GKS for the Euler solutions in 1D case, but the GKS is more robust than GRP. For the 2D high Mach number flow simulations, the GKS is absent from the shock instability and converges to the steady state solutions faster than the GRP. The GRP has carbuncle phenomena, likes a cloud hanging over exact Riemann solvers. The GRP and GKS use different physical processes to describe the flow motion starting from a discontinuity. One is based on the assumption of equilibrium state with infinite number of particle collisions, and the other starts from the non-equilibrium free transport process to evolve into an equilibrium one through particle collisions. The different mechanism in the flux evaluation deviates their numerical performance. Through this study, we may conclude scientifically that it may NOT be valid to use the Euler equations as governing equations to construct numerical fluxes in a discretized space with limited cell resolution. To adapt the Navier–Stokes (NS) equations is NOT valid either because the NS equations describe the flow behavior on the hydrodynamic scale and have no any corresponding physics starting from a discontinuity. This fact alludes to the consistency of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations with the continuum assumption and the necessity of a direct modeling of the physical process in the discretized space in the construction of numerical scheme when modeling very high Mach number flows. The development of numerical algorithm is similar to the modeling process in deriving the governing equations, but the control volume here cannot be shrunk to zero.

An approach to the Riemann problem in the light of a reformulation of the state equation for SPH inviscid ideal flows: a highlight on spiral hydrodynamics in accretion discs

An exact Riemann solver based solution for regular shock refraction

Valid Physical Processes from Numerical Discontinuities in Computational Fluid Dynamics

An accurate and robust axisymmetric SPH method based on Riemann solver with applications in ocean engineering

Spectral Difference method with a posteriori limiting: II- Application to low Mach number flows

Momentum transfer across shear flows in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy formation

A shock-capturing scheme with a novel limiter for compressible flows solved by smoothed particle hydrodynamics

Comparison of the Generalized Riemann Solver and the Gas-Kinetic Scheme for Inviscid Compressible Flow Simulations

An exact axisymmetric spiral solution of incompressible 3D Euler equations

Diffusive terms applied in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of incompressible and isothermal Newtonian fluid flows

Spiral defect chaos in Rayleigh-Bénard convection: Asymptotic and numerical studies of azimuthal flows induced by rotating spirals

Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Astrophysics

Numerical Simulation of Phase Transition with the Hyperbolic Godunov-Peshkov-Romenski Model

A Gas-Kinetic Riemann Solver for Stiffened Gas Interface and Its Application in Multimaterial Flows

General Relativistic Hydrodynamics in Discrete Spacetime: Perfect Fluid Accretion onto Static and Spinning Black Holes

A class of piecewise constant Radon measure solutions to Riemann problems of compressible Euler equations with discontinuous fluxes: pressureless flow versus Chaplygin gas

Revisiting spherically symmetric relativistic hydrodynamics

An Efficient and Generalized Solid Boundary Condition for SPH: Applications to Multi-Phase Flow and Fluid–structure Interaction

Global Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Riemann Problem with Four-Shock Interactions for the Euler Equations for Potential Flow

Adjusting the numerical viscosity in the Godunov-like SPH method at modeling compressible flows

Finite difference method in prolate spheroidal coordinates for freely suspended spheroidal particles in linear flows of viscous and viscoelastic fluids