Abstract:We investigate online scheduling with commitment for parallel identical machines. Our objective is to maximize the total processing time of accepted jobs. As soon as a job has been submitted, the commitment constraint forces us to decide immediately whether we accept or reject the job. Upon acceptance of a job, we must complete it before its deadline $d$ that satisfies $d \geq (1+\epsilon)\cdot p + r$, with $p$ and $r$ being the processing time and the submission time of the job, respectively while $\epsilon>0$ is the slack of the system. Since the hard case typically arises for near-tight deadlines, we consider $\varepsilon\leq 1$. We use competitive analysis to evaluate our algorithms. Our first main contribution is a deterministic preemptive online algorithm with an almost tight competitive ratio on any number of machines. For a single machine, the competitive factor matches the optimal bound $\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}$ of the greedy acceptance policy. Then the competitive ratio improves with an increasing number of machines and approaches $(1+\epsilon)\cdot\ln \frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}$ as the number of machines converges to infinity. This is an exponential improvement over the greedy acceptance policy for small $\epsilon$. In the non-preemptive case, we present a deterministic algorithm on $m$ machines with a competitive ratio of $1+m\cdot \left(\frac{1+\epsilon}{\epsilon}\right)^{\frac{1}{m}}$. This matches the optimal bound of $2+\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ of the greedy acceptance policy for a single machine while it again guarantees an exponential improvement over the greedy acceptance policy for small $\epsilon$ and large $m$. In addition, we determine an almost tight lower bound that approaches $m\cdot \left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)^{\frac{1}{m}}$ for large $m$ and small $\epsilon$.

Window-Based Greedy Contention Management for Transactional Memory

A Competitive Analysis for Balanced Transactional Memory Workloads

Approximating the Optimal Competitive Ratio for an Ancient Online Scheduling Problem

A Comprehensive Scheme For Contention Management In Hardware Transactional Memory

Stable Scheduling in Transactional Memory

Toxic Transactions∗

Contention-aware Lock Scheduling for Transactional Databases

Towards Optimal Transaction Scheduling

Improving High Contention OLTP Performance via Transaction Scheduling

Optimal Time-Abstract Schedulers for CTMDPs and Markov Games

Single-machine Scheduling with Learning Effect and Resource-Dependent Processing Times

Intelligent Transaction Scheduling via Conflict Prediction in OLTP DBMS

The Transactional Conflict Problem

Efficiency-Loss of Greedy Schedules in Non-Preemptive Processing of Jobs with Decaying Value

Maximizing Online Utilization with Commitment

Dynamic Reallocation Problems in Scheduling

Synchronization Aware Conflict Resolution for Runtime Monitoring Using Transactional Memory

Scheduling in the Random-Order Model

Greed Works -- Online Algorithms For Unrelated Machine Stochastic Scheduling

Dynamic Windows Scheduling with Reallocation

Ordered scheduling in control-flow distributed transactional memory