Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Classical-path integral adaptive resolution in molecular simulation: towards a smooth quantum-classical coupling

Analysis of the Forward-Backward Trajectory Solution for the Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Equation.

Semi-classical path integral non-adiabatic dynamics: a partial linearized classical mapping Hamiltonian approach

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Mixed-quantum-classical or fully-quantized dynamics? A unified code to compare methods

Forward–backward Solution of Quantum-Classical Liouville Equation in the Adiabatic Mapping Basis

Nonadiabatic Dynamics Via the Symmetrical Quasi-Classical Method in the Presence of Anharmonicity.

Simulating continuous-space systems with quantum-classical wave functions

Grand Canonical Adaptive Resolution Simulation for Molecules with Electrons: A Theoretical Framework based on Physical Consistency

Quantum-Classical Hybrid Algorithm for the Simulation of All-Electron Correlation

Quantum-Classical Non-Adiabatic Dynamics: Coupled- vs. Independent-Trajectory Methods

[math] Trajectories in Nonadiabatic Quantum-Classical Dynamics

Quantum-Classical Nonadiabatic Dynamics: Coupled- vs Independent-Trajectory Methods

Complex fluid models of mixed quantum-classical dynamics

Simulation of complete many-body quantum dynamics using controlled quantum-semiclassical hybrids

Nonadiabatic Dynamics of Molecules Interacting with Metal Surfaces: A Quantum-Classical Approach Based on Langevin Dynamics and the Hierarchical Equations of Motion

Efficient and accurate surface hopping for long time nonadiabatic quantum dynamics

Path Integral Molecular Dynamics within the Grand Canonical-like Adaptive Resolution Technique: Simulation of Liquid Water

Mixed quantum–classical approach to model non-adiabatic electron–nuclear dynamics: Detailed balance and improved surface hopping method

Quantum Quality with Classical Cost: Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Dynamics Simulations Using the Mapping Approach to Surface Hopping

Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Coupled Trajectories