Abstract:Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an approach to sampling design and analysis which utilizes the networks of social relationships that connect members of the target population, using chain-referral methods to facilitate sampling. RDS typically leads to biased sampling, favoring participants with many acquaintances. Naive estimates, such as the sample average, which are uncorrected for the sampling bias, will themselves be biased. To compensate for this bias, current methodology suggests inverse-degree weighting, where the "degree" is the number of acquaintances. This stems from the fundamental RDS assumption that the probability of sampling an individual is proportional to their degree. Since this assumption is tenuous at best, we propose to harness the additional information encapsulated in the time of recruitment, into a model-based inference framework for RDS. This information is typically collected by researchers, but ignored. We adapt methods developed for inference in epidemic processes to estimate the population size, degree counts and frequencies. While providing valuable information in themselves, these quantities ultimately serve to debias other estimators, such a disease's prevalence. A fundamental advantage of our approach is that, being model-based, it makes all assumptions of the data-generating process explicit. This enables verification of the assumptions, maximum likelihood estimation, extension with covariates, and model selection. We develop asymptotic theory, proving consistency and asymptotic normality properties. We further compare these estimators to the standard inverse-degree weighting through simulations, and using real-world data. In both cases we find our estimators to outperform current methods. The likelihood problem in the model we present is convex, and thus efficiently solvable. We implement these estimators in an R package, chords, available on CRAN.

The Sensitivity of Respondent-driven Sampling Method

Respondent-driven sampling bias induced by clustering and community structure in social networks

Respondent-driven sampling on directed networks

Linked Ego Networks: Improving estimate reliability and validity with respondent-driven sampling

New Survey Questions and Estimators for Network Clustering with Respondent-driven Sampling Data

Modeling and Analysing Respondent Driven Sampling as a Counting Process

Respondent-Driven Sampling:Method and Practice of Studying Hidden Populations

Identification of Homophily and Preferential Recruitment in Respondent-Driven Sampling

General Regression Methods for Respondent-Driven Sampling Data

Respondent-driven sampling and an unusual epidemic

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recruitment Patterns on RDS Estimates among a Socially Ordered Population of Female Sex Workers in China.

The graphical structure of respondent-driven sampling

Hidden population size estimation from respondent-driven sampling: a network approach

Seeing the Unseen Network: Inferring Hidden Social Ties from Respondent-Driven Sampling

The Application of Respondent-Driven Sampling in Recruiting MSM

Novel sampling design for respondent-driven sampling

Network Structure and Biased Variance Estimation in Respondent Driven Sampling

Estimating hidden population size from a single respondent-driven sampling survey

Simple estimators for network sampling

Binary regression analysis with network structure of respondent-driven sampling data

The Development and the Assessment of Sampling Methods for Hard-to-Reach Populations in HIV Surveillance