Scalar-Scalar, Scalar-Tensor, and Tensor-Tensor Correlators from Anisotropic Inflation

A.E. Gumrukcuoglu,Burak Himmetoglu,Marco Peloso
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.063528
2010-01-26
Abstract:We compute the phenomenological signatures of a model (Watanabe et al' 09) of anisotropic inflation driven by a scalar and a vector field. The action for the vector is U(1) invariant, and the model is free of ghost instabilities. A suitable coupling of the scalar to the kinetic term of the vector allows for a slow roll evolution of the vector vev, and hence for a prolonged anisotropic expansion; this provides a counter example to the cosmic no hair conjecture. We compute the nonvanishing two point correlation functions between physical modes of the system, and express them in terms of power spectra with angular dependence. The anisotropy parameter g_* for the scalar-scalar spectrum (defined as in the Ackerman et al '07 parametrization) turns out to be negative in the simplest realization of the model, which, therefore, cannot account for the angular dependence emerged in some analyses of the WMAP data. A g_* of order -0.1 is achieved when the energy of the vector is about 6-7 orders of magnitude smaller than that of the scalar during inflation. For such values of the parameters, the scalar-tensor correlation (which is in principle a distinctive signature of anisotropic spaces) is smaller than the tensor-tensor correlation.
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Phenomenology,High Energy Physics - Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the anisotropic phenomena that occur during the early expansion phase of the universe (i.e., cosmic inflation). Specifically, the authors explore an anisotropic inflation model driven by scalar and vector fields, which can explain some of the anisotropic features of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observed in the WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) data. These problems include: 1. **Low Quadrupole Moment Power**: The WMAP data shows that on large scales of the cosmic microwave background, the power of the quadrupole moment is lower than expected. 2. **Alignment of the Lowest Multipoles**: Some low - order multipoles (especially the dipole and quadrupole) show unexpected alignment phenomena. 3. **Cold Spot**: There is a cold spot within approximately 5 degrees, and its power is lower than expected. 4. **Power Asymmetry between the Northern and Southern Celestial Hemispheres**: The CMB power in the northern and southern hemispheres shows asymmetry. 5. **Violation of Rotational Invariance**: These observations indicate that the statistical properties of the CMB in some directions are inconsistent with the standard isotropic assumption. To study these problems, the authors introduce a specific model that contains a scalar field and a vector field, and the kinetic term of the vector field is modulated by a function of the scalar field. In this way, the model can maintain anisotropic expansion for a long time during inflation, thus providing a possible mechanism to explain the above - observed anisotropic features. ### Main Contributions of the Paper 1. **Model Description**: The authors describe in detail the background evolution equations of this model and show how to achieve long - term anisotropic expansion by choosing an appropriate scalar - field function \( f(\phi) \). 2. **Perturbation Analysis**: They calculate various perturbation modes in this model (scalar - scalar, scalar - tensor, and tensor - tensor correlation functions) and represent these correlation functions as power spectra with angular dependence. 3. **Parameter Analysis**: They pay special attention to the angular - dependence parameter \( g^* \) of the scalar - scalar correlation function and discuss whether the value of this parameter can explain the observations in the WMAP data. 4. **Stability Verification**: They prove that this model is stable without introducing ghost fields, which makes this model a counter - example to Wald's theorem. ### Conclusion Although this model theoretically provides a possible mechanism to explain the anisotropic features in the WMAP data, the authors find that even with the best parameter selection, the \( g^* \) value predicted by the model still cannot fully match the observations in the WMAP data. Therefore, although this model is theoretically attractive, it may still need further development and improvement to fully explain the observational data.