Abstract:Standards and Codes of Practice for designing new constructions and for assessing and strengthening existing ones are usually based on uniform hazard maps, where different Limit States (LSs) are associated with different hazard-exceedance probabilities. This approach yields non-homogeneous LS-exceedance probabilities across a territory, thus failing to achieve the goal of uniform risk throughout a territory. Such lack of uniformity stems from estimating the probability of failure using capacity and demand models. If the capacity of new constructions-or the capacity increase of strengthened existing constructions-are designed based on a prescribed hazard-exceedance probability, then the seismic risk depends on both the structure (depending on the design philosophy and corresponding design objectives), through the capacity model, and the location, through the hazard model. The aim of this study is threefold. First, it provides a seismic probability assessment formulation and a risk-targeted intensity measure based on a linear model in log-log coordinates of the hazard, under the assumption of log-normal capacity and demand. The proposed framework introduces a factor that multiplies the code hazard-based demand to account either for intentional (from design) over-capacity or for undesired (e.g., in existing constructions) under-capacity. Second, this paper shows an application to peak ground accelerations in Europe considering parameters taken from Standards and Codes of Practice. The developed framework is used to determine the risk-target levels of peak ground acceleration used for design in Europe, for both new and existing constructions. Third, the obtained target risk levels are used to determine a risk-based intensity modification factor and a risk-based mean return period modification factor, which can be readily implemented in current Standards to achieve risk-targeted design actions, with equal LS-exceedance probability across the territory. The framework is independent of the chosen hazard-based intensity measure, be it the commonly used peak ground acceleration or any other measure. The results highlight that in large areas of Europe the design peak ground acceleration should be increased to achieve the proposed seismic risk target and that this is particularly significant for existing constructions, given their larger uncertainties and typical low capacity with respect to the code hazard-based demand.

Modelling seismic ground motion and its uncertainty in different tectonic contexts: challenges and application to the 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM20)

Regionally adjusted stochastic earthquake ground motion models, associated variabilities and epistemic uncertainties

A Bayesian update of Kotha et al. (2020) ground-motion model using Résif dataset

Backbone ground motion model through simulated records and XGBoost machine learning algorithm: An application for the Azores plateau (Portugal)

Site-specific stochastic ground motion model utilizing deterministic physics-informed simulations: A Bayesian approach

A regionalized partially nonergodic ground-motion data driven model for low to moderate seismicity areas: using RESIF-RAP, ESM, RESORCE and NGA-West2 data

Regional seismic ground‐motion simulation and observation with engineering applications

Statistical modeling of ground motion relations for seismic hazard analysis

Impact of definition approach on Fourier ground-motion variability of shallow crustal earthquakes in Europe

Can damage observations from the 2019 Le Teil (France) earthquake challenge ESHM20 and ESRM20?

Understanding single-station ground motion variability and uncertainty (sigma): lessons learnt from EUROSEISTEST

Handling Uncertainty in Models of Seismic and Postseismic Hazards: Toward Robust Methods and Resilient Societies

Suitability Analysis of Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Western and Central Himalayas and Indo-Gangetic Plains

Ground-motion models for earthquakes occurring in the United Kingdom

The 2023 US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground-motion characterization for the conterminous United States

Accounting for the Variability of Earthquake Rates within Low-Seismicity Regions: Application to the 2022 Aotearoa New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model

Towards risk-targeted seismic hazard models for Europe

Model of seismic design lateral force levels for the existing reinforced concrete European building stock

Gaussian Processes for Probabilistic Estimates of Earthquake Ground Shaking: A 1-D Proof-of-Concept

Development of a probabilistic seismic microzonation software considering geological and geotechnical uncertainties