Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the characteristics of delayed panfacial fractures and evaluate treatment results.Patients and Methods: Thirty-three patients with delayed panfacial fractures were treated in the Maxillofacial Trauma Center of Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology between 1998 and 2004. Each patient was examined by computed tomography (CT) scans before operation. For those who had no severe opening restriction, dental impressions were taken to fabricate dental casts. For those with severely comminuted fractures, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the facial skeleton were used. Re-establishing the continuity of the mandible was the first step and then used as a platform to reconstruct the maxillary fractures via maxillomandibular fixation after Le Fort I osteotomy. The third step was to restore the mid- and upper-facial width and projection by coronal approach to expose the zygomatic complex and frontal bone/sinus and/or naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fractures.Results: There were 3 types of mandibular fractures that affected the treatment plan: 1) type 1, mandibular body/symphysis fracture(s) (17/33, 51-52%); 2) type 11, mandibular angle and/or condylar fracture(s) (6/33, 18.18%); and 3) type 111, both mandibular body/symphysis and angle/condylar fractures (10/33, 30-30%). Fourteen cases were associated with NOE fractures (42.42%) and 3 cases had frontal sinus fractures (9.1%). Twelve cases had enophthalmos (36-36%) and 3 lost 1 eyeball. The order of treatment was dependent on the mandibular fracture type. For type I fractures, reconstructing the mandibular arch was the first step. For type 11 fractures, repairing the angle, ascending rami, and condylar areas was the first step. For type III fractures, when both mandibular height and arch were disrupted, freeing the malunited angle or condyle was the first step before restoring the mandibular arch form. Reconstruction of the mandibular height and projection was then carried out. For all 3 types, the second step was to restore the mid- and upper facial width and projection by reducing the zygomatic complex and frontal bone/sinus or NOE fractures. Maxillary fixation across the Le Fort I level was the last step. Le Fort I osteotomy was used for all 33 cases. Bone grafts and soft tissue suspension also were used. Twenty-one cases (63.64%) had good results, 7 (21.21%) cases were acceptable, and 5 (15.15%) were not good. There were 7 cases (21.21%) that still had soft tissue problems that needed secondary operations.Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible first with Le Fort I osteotomy is a good way to treat delayed panfacial fractures. Computed tomography and 3D CT, model surgery, and occasionally 3D models are necessary aids for diagnosis and treatment. Soft tissue Problems, including lacerations and asymmetries, were often the factors that caused an unfavorable outcome. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

"Air Sign" in Misdiagnosed Mandibular Fractures Based on CT and CBCT Evaluation

Diagnostic Utility of the "Air Sign" as a Radiological Indicator for Mandibular Body and Angle Fractures

PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE TOMOGRAPHIC ASPECTS OF CONDYLE FIXATION AND MANDIBULAR FRACTURE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

Assessment of parasymphysis and ramus fractures in pediatric patients using panoramic radiographs and CBCT: a case report

The relationship between unilateral mandibular angle fracture and temporomandibular joint function

Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings for midfacial and mandibular fractures

Panfacial Fractures: Analysis of 33 Cases Treated Late

COMPLICATIONS OF CONSERVATIVE AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR PROCESS (LITERATURE REVIEW)

Influence of Method of Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures on Range of Articular Path Measured by Cadiax Device

Characteristics and treatment of mandibular condyle sagittal fracture

A Single Center Experience: A Retrospective Study Over 10-Years Period on Mandible Fractures

Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis as a Sequel of an Overlooked Condylar Fracture in a Child

Plane Measurement of Three-Dimensional CT Images on the Diagnosis of Zygomatic Fractures.

Evaluation and Prediction of Healing Morphology After Closed Reduction for Unilateral Mandibular Condyle Fractures

Fracture patterns in cleft orthognathic surgery. a cross-sectional study

Diagnosis of split fractures of the mandible in adults

Analysis of Mandibular Muscle Variations Following Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review

Comparative Analysis of Concentional X-ray Film,2d-Ct and 3D-CT in Evaluation the Mandibular Condyle Fracture

Injury Risk Estimation in Mandible-Related Surgical Procedures: A CBCT Study Based on Vital Interforaminal Anatomical Structures

Correlation between Tomography Scan Findings and Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Orbital Floor Fractures

The Adelaide Facial Bone Rule: A simple prediction model and clinical guideline for the presence of facial fractures using CT brain scans in victims of minor trauma