Abstract:Creativity is widely considered a skill essential to succeeding in the modern world. Numerous creativity training programs have been developed, and several meta-analyses have attempted to summarize the effectiveness of these programs and identify the features influencing their impact. Unfortunately, previous meta-analyses share a number of limitations, most notably overlooking the potentially strong impact of publication bias and the influence of study quality on effect sizes. We undertook a meta-analysis of 169 creativity training studies across 5 decades (844 effect sizes, the largest meta-analysis of creativity training to date), including a substantial number of unpublished studies (48 studies; 262 effect sizes). We employed a range of statistical methods to detect and adjust for publication bias and evaluated the robustness of the evidence in the field. In line with previous meta-analyses, we found a moderate training effect (0.53 <i>SD</i>s; unadjusted for publication bias). Critically, we observed converging evidence consistent with strong publication bias. All adjustment methods considerably lowered our original estimate (adjusted estimates ranged from 0.29 to 0.32 <i>SD</i>s). This severe bias casts doubt on the representativeness of the published literature in the field and on the conclusions of previous meta-analyses. Our analysis also revealed a high prevalence of methodological shortcomings in creativity training studies (likely to have inflated our average effect), and little signs of methodological improvement over time-a situation that limits the usefulness of this body of work. We conclude by presenting implications and recommendations for researchers and practitioners, and we propose an agenda for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Are Creativity Tests Vulnerable to Coaching?

Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

What do educators need to know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A comprehensive review

Creativity is Allowing for Failures: Leader Failure Tolerance and Employee Creativity

What Happens After Nomination? Evaluating the Probability of Gifted Identification With the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking

A Reliability Generalization of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural

Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativity

Adaption-Innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The Level-Style Issue Revisited

The impact of creativity training on creative performance: A meta-analytic review and critical evaluation of 5 decades of creativity training studies.

Learning to judge creativity: The underlying mechanisms in creativity training for non-expert judges

A Comparative Test of Creative Thinking in Preschool Children and Dolphins

Age-related changes in creative thinking during late childhood: the contribution of Cooperative Learning

The Relationship Between Creativity and Behavior Problems Among Underachieving Elementary and High School Students

Creativity assessment in neuroscience research.

Effect of the STEAM Method on Children’s Creativity

Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in College: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

Assessing Creativity in the Language Classroom with the Consensual Assessment Technique

Revisiting Individual Creativity Assessment: Triangulation in Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods

Creativity on Tap? The Effect of Creativity Anxiety Under Evaluative Pressure

Decomposing the True Score Variance in Rated Responses to Divergent Thinking-Tasks for Assessing Creativity: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis