Contrasting patterns in the early stage of SARS-CoV-2 evolution between humans and minks

Guanghao Li,Jui Hung Tai,Hsiao Yu Sun,Yi Cheng Tseng,Sui Yuan Chang,Shiou Hwei Yeh,Pei Jer Chen,Shu Miaw Chaw,Hurng Yi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msac156
IF: 10.7
2022-08-09
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Abstract:One of the unique features of SARS-CoV-2 is its apparent neutral evolution during the early pandemic (before February 2020). This contrasts with the preceding SARS-CoV epidemics, where viruses evolved adaptively. SARS-CoV-2 may exhibit a unique or adaptive feature which deviates from other coronaviruses. Alternatively, the virus may have been cryptically circulating in humans for a sufficient time to have acquired adaptive changes before the onset of the current pandemic. To test the scenarios above, we analyzed the SARS-CoV-2 sequences from minks ( Neovision vision ) and parental humans. In the early phase of the mink epidemic (April to May 2020), nonsynonymous to synonymous mutation ratio per site in the spike protein is 2.93, indicating a selection process favoring adaptive amino acid changes. Mutations in the spike protein were concentrated within its receptor binding domain and receptor binding motif. An excess of high frequency derived variants produced by genetic hitchhiking was found during the middle (June to July 2020) and late phase I (August to September 2020) of the mink epidemic. In contrast, the site frequency spectra of early SARS-CoV-2 in humans only show an excess of low frequency mutations, consistent with the recent outbreak of the virus. Strong positive selection in the mink SARS-CoV-2 implies the virus may not be pre-adapted to a wide range of hosts and illustrates how a virus evolves to establish a continuous infection in a new host. Therefore, the lack of positive selection signal during the early pandemic in humans deserves further investigation.
genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?