Protocol for a bandit-based response adaptive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of brief self-guided digital interventions for reducing psychological distress in university students: the Vibe Up study
Kit Huckvale,Leonard Hoon,Eileen Stech,Jill M Newby,Wu Yi Zheng,Jin Han,Rajesh Vasa,Sunil Gupta,Scott Barnett,Manisha Senadeera,Stuart Cameron,Stefanus Kurniawan,Akash Agarwal,Joost Funke Kupper,Joshua Asbury,David Willie,Alasdair Grant,Henry Cutler,Bonny Parkinson,Antonio Ahumada-Canale,Joanne R Beames,Rena Logothetis,Marya Bautista,Jodie Rosenberg,Artur Shvetcov,Thomas Quinn,Andrew Mackinnon,Santu Rana,Truyen Tran,Simon Rosenbaum,Kon Mouzakis,Aliza Werner-Seidler,Alexis Whitton,Svetha Venkatesh,Helen Christensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066249
IF: 3.006
2023-04-29
BMJ Open
Abstract:Introduction Meta-analytical evidence confirms a range of interventions, including mindfulness, physical activity and sleep hygiene, can reduce psychological distress in university students. However, it is unclear which intervention is most effective. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven adaptive trials may be an efficient method to determine what works best and for whom. The primary purpose of the study is to rank the effectiveness of mindfulness, physical activity, sleep hygiene and an active control on reducing distress, using a multiarm contextual bandit-based AI-adaptive trial method. Furthermore, the study will explore which interventions have the largest effect for students with different levels of baseline distress severity. Methods and analysis The Vibe Up study is a pragmatically oriented, decentralised AI-adaptive group sequential randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of one of three brief, 2-week digital self-guided interventions (mindfulness, physical activity or sleep hygiene) or active control (ecological momentary assessment) in reducing self-reported psychological distress in Australian university students. The adaptive trial methodology involves up to 12 sequential mini-trials that allow for the optimisation of allocation ratios. The primary outcome is change in psychological distress (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, 21-item version, DASS-21 total score) from preintervention to postintervention. Secondary outcomes include change in physical activity, sleep quality and mindfulness from preintervention to postintervention. Planned contrasts will compare the four groups (ie, the three intervention and control) using self-reported psychological distress at prespecified time points for interim analyses. The study aims to determine the best performing intervention, as well as ranking of other interventions. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was sought and obtained from the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC A, HC200466). A trial protocol adhering to the requirements of the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice was prepared for and approved by the Sponsor, UNSW Sydney (Protocol number: HC200466_CTP). Trial registration number ACTRN12621001223820.
medicine, general & internal