Nomogram Development and Validation for Predicting Postoperative Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Based on Paraspinal Muscle Parameters
Ming Tang,Siyuan Wang,Yiwen Wang,Fanyi Zeng,Mianpeng Chen,Xindong Chang,Mingfei He,Qingqing Fang,Shiwu Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s459846
IF: 2.8319
2024-06-15
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Ming Tang, 1, 2, &ast Siyuan Wang, 1, 2, &ast Yiwen Wang, 1 Fanyi Zeng, 1 Mianpeng Chen, 1 Xindong Chang, 1 Mingfei He, 1 Qingqing Fang, 1 Shiwu Yin 1 1 Department of Interventional Vascular Medicine, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China; 2 The Fifth Clinical College of Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Shiwu Yin, Department of Interventional Vascular Medicine, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, 574 Changjiang East Road, Yaohai District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, 230011, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: Previous studies highlight paraspinal muscles' significance in spinal stability. This study aims to assess paraspinal muscle predictiveness for postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation (PRLDH) after lumbar disc herniation patients undergo percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD). Patients and Methods: Retrospectively collected data from 232 patients undergoing PETD treatment at our institution between January 2020 and January 2023, randomly allocated into training (60%) and validation (40%) groups. Utilizing Lasso regression and multivariable logistic regression, independent risk factors were identified in the training set to construct a Nomogram model. Internal validation employed Enhanced Bootstrap, with Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) assessing accuracy. Calibration was evaluated through calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) were employed for clinical utility analysis. Results: Diabetes, Modic changes, and ipsilesional multifidus muscle skeletal muscle index (SMI) were independent predictive factors for PRLDH following PETD ( P < 0.05). Developed Nomogram model based on selected predictors, uploaded to a web page. AUC for training: 0.921 (95% CI 0.872– 0.970), validation: 0.900 (95% CI 0.828– 0.972), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded χ 2 =5.638/6.259, P =0.688/0.618, and calibration curves exhibited good fit between observed and predicted values. DCA and CIC demonstrate clinical net benefit for both models at risk thresholds of 0.02– 1.00 and 0.02– 0.80. Conclusion: The Nomogram predictive model developed based on paraspinal muscle parameters in this study demonstrates excellent predictive capability and aids in personalized risk assessment for PRLDH following PETD. Keywords: lumbar disc herniation, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation, predictive model Intervertebral disc-related low back pain (LBP), comprising 39% of all cases, is mainly attributed to disc herniation (approximately 30%), with other causes being less common. 1 Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) occurs when the fibrous ring of an intervertebral disc ruptures, leading to the protrusion and exposure of the nucleus pulposus in the surrounding fluid. 2 This leads to inflammation and compression of nerve roots, causing nerve root damage and subsequent symptoms such as lower back and leg pain. 3 In recent years, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) has emerged as a preferred minimally invasive treatment for LDH. PETD offers advantages such as minimal trauma, fewer complications, and quicker recovery. 4 However, postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation (PRLDH) remains a concern, with an incidence ranging from 3–16% according to the literature. 5–7 The spine's stability depends on the passive subsystem (vertebrae, intervertebral discs, facet joints, spinal ligaments), active subsystem (paraspinal muscles), and neural control subsystem, which are both independent and interconnected. 8 Therefore, impairment in any of these components can result in reduced spinal function. Crisco et al 9 conducted load-bearing experiments on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae with muscles removed, retaining only the ligaments. They observed that lumbar stability decreased when subjected to an average load of 88N, whereas the intact lumbar system in a living body could withstand an average load of 2600N. To explore the impact of paraspinal muscles on PRLDH, we reviewed the relevant literature and found that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the gold standard methods for assessing whole-body and local skelet -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology