Exercise Intensity Independently Modulates Thermal Behavior During Exercise Recovery, but Not During Exercise
Nicole T. Vargas,Christopher L. Chapman,Blair D. Johnson,Rob Gathercole,Zachary J. Schlader
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000562203.15171.36
2019-01-01
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:PURPOSE: High intensity (HI) exercise stimulates greater heat production than moderate intensity (MI) exercise, but also reduces perceptual thermal sensitivity. Thus, thermal behavior may differ between HI and MI exercise. We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior is greater during HI compared to MI exercise and recovery. Methods: In a 27.0±0.4°C, 21±3% RH environment, 20 subjects (10 females) cycled for 30 min at MI (53±6% VO2peak) or HI (78±6% VO2peak), followed by 120 min seated recovery. Mean skin (10 site) and core (telemetry pill) temperatures, and mean skin wettedness (8 site) were recorded continuously. Participants maintained a thermally comfortable neck temperature throughout using a custom-made device. Neck device temperature provided an index of thermal behavior. The weighted average of mean skin and core temperatures, and mean skin wettedness provided an indication of the mean afferent stimulus to thermally behave. RESULTS: Mean skin (by +0.4±0.7°C, P<0.01) and core (by +0.4±0.3°C, P<0.01) temperatures were higher at end exercise in HI. Mean skin temperature was not different between trials by 10 min recovery (P≥0.96). Core temperature was higher in HI until 90 min recovery (P≤0.01). Mean skin wettedness (by +0.04±0.06 a.u., P=0.03) and the mean afferent stimulus (by +2.5±3.5 a.u., P=0.01) were greater at 10 min of exercise in HI, and remained until 60 min into recovery (P<0.01). The decrease in neck device temperature was greater in HI during exercise (at 30 min: by -4.9±9.6°C, P≤0.06), but did not differ after 20 min recovery (P≥0.60). There were negative relationships between the mean afferent stimulus and neck device temperature for exercise (HI: r=-0.91, MI: r=-0.96, both P<0.01) and recovery (HI: r=-0.98, MI: r=-0.96, both P<0.01). During exercise, there were no differences in the slope (HI: -0.93±0.31; MI: -0.87±0.14°C/a.u., P=0.49) or y-intercept (HI: 43.4±11.6 a.u., MI: 43.8±4.9°C a.u., P=0.91). During recovery, the slope was steeper (-0.94±0.06 vs. -0.77±0.78°C/a.u., P<0.01) and y-intercept higher (49.3±2.0 vs. 41.7±2.3°C, P<0.01) in HI. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal behavior is greater during HI exercise due to a greater afferent stimulus to behave. However, the withdrawal of thermal behavior is augmented following HI versus MI exercise. This study was funded by lululemon athletica inc.