Survival scenarios of patients with localized and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A population‐based study

Steven C. Kuijper,Anne M. Gehrels,Lydia G. van der Geest,Rob H. A. Verhoeven,Bas Groot Koerkamp,I. Quintus Molenaar,Martijn W. J. Stommel,Vincent E. de Meijer,J. de Vos‐Geelen,Miriam L. Wumkes,Marc G. Besselink,Johanna W. Wilmink,Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven,for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35267
2024-11-30
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's New? Survival from pancreatic cancer has marginally improved with the availability of new treatments options. As pancreatic cancer incidence continues to increase, ensuring that predicted survival reflects real‐world scenarios is essential. Here, the authors investigated survival in terms of best‐ and worst‐case scenarios among patients with localized or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. From 2005 to 2021, survival in the best‐case scenario improved for both localized and metastatic disease, indicating that patients with the best prognosis have benefited the most from therapeutic advances. No improvements in survival were observed in the worst‐case scenarios. Moreover, survival decreased among patients who received only best supportive care. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is notorious for its poor survival. The provision of survival scenarios—that is, best‐case, typical and worst‐case scenarios—could prove valuable to patients and clinicians. This study investigated survival scenarios and how these have changed over a period of 16 years for patients with PAC. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used to identify patients with localized and metastatic PAC (2005–2021). Survival scenarios, including best‐case, upper‐typical, typical (median), lower‐typical, and worst‐case, were estimated based on survival curve percentiles (p10, p25, p50, p75, and p90). Annual differences were assessed for significance using weighted linear regression analyses. Factors associated with these scenarios were identified through univariable tests. Overall, 14,622 patients with localized and 20,199 with metastatic PAC were included. For patients with localized PAC, the best, upper‐typical and typical survival scenarios improved statistically significant with average annual improvement of 1.54 (95%CI: 1.2–1.88), 0.67 (0.56–0.78), and 0.24 (0.19–0.29) months, respectively. For patients with metastatic PAC the best and upper‐typical survival scenarios increased statically significantly with annual improvement of 0.28 (0.21–0.34) and 0.06 (0.02–0.09) months, respectively. The best‐case and upper‐typical scenarios were associated with younger patients, more aggressive disease‐focused treatments, fewer comorbidities, and better overall performance status. Over the past 16 years, survival improvements in patients with PAC have been most notable in these scenarios. Although the absolute gains were modest, these results offer encouraging potential for advancements in life‐prolonging care for this type of cancer.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?