Cost‐effectiveness analysis of continuing bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after first progression of metastatic colorectal cancer

Yulian Li,Min Hu,Zhe Zhang,Mingming Chu,Rufu Xu,Lulu Liu,Wenxing Dong,Mengmeng Yang,Rong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6904
IF: 4.711
2024-01-09
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Background Continuation of bevacizumab plus second‐line chemotherapy has significantly improved overall and progression‐free survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the cost‐effectiveness of such high cost therapy is still uncertain in China; so this analysis was performed to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of these treatment options from the Chinese health care system perspective. Methods A cost‐effectiveness analysis was conducted using data from the ML18147 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00700102) by modeling a partitioned survival model. Main evaluation indicators were quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) with a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of ‐ 22,761.62 compared with chemotherapy, resulting in an ICER of ‐ 38,201 per QALY. The scenario analysis found that bevacizumab biosimilar gained an ICER of 38,201 per QALY, continuation of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is unlikely considered cost‐effective for patients after first progression of mCRC.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?