Abstract:We perform an extensive review of the numerous studies and methods used to determine the total mass of the Milky Way. We group the various studies into seven broad classes according to their modeling approaches. The classes include: i) estimating Galactic escape velocity using high velocity objects; ii) measuring the rotation curve through terminal and circular velocities; iii) modeling halo stars, globular clusters and satellite galaxies with the spherical Jeans equation and iv) with phase-space distribution functions; v) simulating and modeling the dynamics of stellar streams and their progenitors; vi) modeling the motion of the Milky Way, M31 and other distant satellites under the framework of Local Group timing argument; and vii) measurements made by linking the brightest Galactic satellites to their counterparts in simulations. For each class of methods, we introduce their theoretical and observational background, the method itself, the sample of available tracer objects, model assumptions, uncertainties, limits and the corresponding measurements that have been achieved in the past. Both the measured total masses within the radial range probed by tracer objects and the extrapolated virial masses are discussed and quoted. We also discuss the role of modern numerical simulations in terms of helping to validate model assumptions, understanding systematic uncertainties and calibrating the measurements. While measurements in the last two decades show a factor of two scatters, recent measurements using Gaia DR2 data are approaching a higher precision. We end with a detailed discussion of future developments in the field, especially as the size and quality of the observational data will increase tremendously with current and future surveys. In such cases, the systematic uncertainties will be dominant and thus will necessitate a much more rigorous testing and characterization of the various mass determination methods.

Milky Way mass with K giants and BHB stars using LAMOST, SDSS/SEGUE, and Gaia : 3D spherical Jeans equation and tracer mass estimator

The Milky Way’s Circular Velocity Curve to 60 Kpc and an Estimate of the Dark Matter Halo Mass from the Kinematics of ∼2400 SDSS Blue Horizontal‐Branch Stars

M ay 2 00 8 The Milky Way ’ s Circular Velocity Curve to 60 kpc and an Estimate of the Dark Matter Halo Mass from the Kinematics of ∼ 2400 SDSS Blue Horizontal-Branch Stars

The Mass of Our Milky Way

The mass of the Milky Way out to 100 kpc using halo stars

Galactic mass and anisotropy profile with halo K-giant and blue horizontal branch stars from LAMOST/SDSS and <i>Gaia</i>

CENTRAL MASS AND LUMINOSITY OF MILKY WAY SATELLITES IN THE Λ COLD DARK MATTER MODEL

Deposited in DRO : 19 February 2019 Version of attached le : Peer-review status of attached

The Milky Way's rotation curve out to 100 kpc and its constraint on the Galactic mass distribution

Constraints on the Assembly History of the Milky Way's Smooth, Diffuse Stellar Halo from the Metallicity-dependent, Radially Dominated Velocity Anisotropy Profiles Probed with K Giants and BHB Stars Using LAMOST, SDSS/SEGUE, and Gaia

Milky Way Tomography with K and M Dwarf Stars: the Vertical Structure of the Galactic Disk

Constraining the Milky Way Mass Profile with Phase-space Distribution of Satellite Galaxies

The Orbital PDF: the Dynamical State of Milky Way Sized Haloes and the Intrinsic Uncertainty in the Determination of Their Masses

The Cumulative Mass Profile of the Milky Way as Determined by Globular Cluster Kinematics from Gaia DR2

The Outer Stellar Mass of Massive Galaxies: A Simple Tracer of Halo Mass with Scatter Comparable to Richness and Reduced Projection Effects

The Mass of the Milky Way from Satellite Dynamics

The Surface Mass Density of the Milky Way: Does the Traditional $K_Z$ Approach Work in the Context of New Surveys?

The Mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from the Three-Dimensional Kinematics of its Globular Clusters

Halo K-Giant Stars from LAMOST: Kinematics and Galactic Mass Estimate

Individual Stellar Haloes of Massive Galaxies Measured to 100 Kpc at 0.3 < Z < 0.5 Using Hyper Suprime-Cam