Bayesian games with intentions

Adam Bjorndahl,Joseph Y. Halpern,Rafael Pass
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.06.003
IF: 1.265
2020-09-01
Games and Economic Behavior
Abstract:<p>We define <em>Bayesian games with intentions</em> by introducing a distinction between "intended" and "actual" actions, generalizing both Bayesian games and (static) <em>psychological games</em> <a class="workspace-trigger" href="#br0010">Geanakoplos et al. (1989)</a>. We propose a new solution concept for this framework and prove that Nash equilibria in static psychological games correspond to a special class of equilibria as defined in our setting. We also show how the actual/intended divide can be used to implement the distinction between "real" outcomes and "reference" outcomes so crucial to <em>prospect theory</em>, and how some of the core insights of prospect theory can thereby be captured using Bayesian games with intentions.</p>
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?