Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. BackgroundIn economic evaluations of novel therapies, assessing lifetime effects based on trial data often necessitates survival extrapolation, with the choice of model affecting outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy and variability between alternative approaches to survival extrapolation.MethodsData on HER2-positive breast cancer patients from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register were used to fit standard parametric distribution (SPD) models and excess hazard (EH) models adjusting the survival projections based on general population mortality (GPM). Models were fitted using 6-y data for stage I and II, 4-y data for stage III, and 2-y data for stage IV cancer reflecting an early data cutoff while maintaining sufficient events for comparison of model estimates with actual long-term outcomes. We compared model projections of 15-y survival and restricted mean survival time (RMST) to 15-y registry data and explored the variability between models in extrapolations of long-term survival.ResultsAmong 11,224 patients compared with the observed registry 15-y RMST estimates across the disease stages, EH cure models provided the most accurate estimates in patients with stage I to III cancer, whereas EH models without cure most closely matched survival in patients with stage IV cancer, in which cure assumption was less plausible. The Akaike information criterion–averaged model projections varied as follows: −8.2% to +5.3% for SPD models, −4.9% to +5.2% for the EH model without a cure assumption, and −19.3% to −0.2% for the EH model with a cure assumption. EH models significantly reduced between-model variance in the predicted RMSTs over a 50-y time horizon compared with SPD models.ConclusionsEH models may be considered as alternatives to SPD models to produce more accurate and plausible survival extrapolation that accounts for general population mortality.HighlightsExcess hazard (EH) methods have been suggested as an approach to incorporate background mortality rates in economic evaluation using survival extrapolation.We highlight that EH models with or without a cure assumption can produce more accurate survival projections and significantly reduce between-model variability in comparison with standard parametric distribution models across cancer stages.EH models may be a preferred modeling method to reduce model uncertainty in health economic modeling since models that would otherwise have produced implausible extrapolations are constrained by the EH framework.Reduced uncertainty in economic evaluations will enhance the application of evidence-based health care decision making.

SurvInt: a simple tool to obtain precise parametric survival extrapolations

survextrap: a package for flexible and transparent survival extrapolation

Blended Survival Curves: A New Approach to Extrapolation for Time-to-Event Outcomes from Clinical Trials in Health Technology Assessment

Blended Survival Curves: A New Approach to Extrapolation for Time-to-Event Outcomes from Clinical Trial in Health Technology Assessment

Impact of limited sample size and follow-up on single event survival extrapolation for health technology assessment: a simulation study

Stable Survival Extrapolation via Transfer Learning

An Evaluation of an Algorithm for the Selection of Flexible Survival Models for Cancer Immunotherapies: Pass or Fail?

INES: Interactive tool for construction and extrapolation of partitioned survival models

Comparing Survival Extrapolation within All-Cause and Relative Survival Frameworks by Standard Parametric Models and Flexible Parametric Spline Models Using the Swedish Cancer Registry

Parmsurv: a SAS Macro for Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis with Long-Term Predictions

General Population Mortality Adjustment in Survival Extrapolation of Cancer Trials: Exploring Plausibility and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Sweden

A review and comparison of methods for recreating individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves for economic evaluations: a simulation study.

Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study

MPES-R: Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis in R for Survival Extrapolation—A Tutorial

Using Clinical Experts Beliefs to Compare Survival Models in Health Technology Assessment

Unbiased Prediction and Feature Selection in High-Dimensional Survival Regression

Non-parametric cure rate estimation under insufficient follow-up using extremes

Estimand-based Inference in Presence of Long-Term Survivors

Bayesian parametric models for survival prediction in medical applications

Simultaneous Prediction Intervals for Patient-Specific Survival Curves

The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data