Abstract:<p>Highly efficient, tunable, biocompatible, and environmentally friendly electrochemical sensors featuring graphene‐based materials pose a formidable challenge for computational chemistry. In silico rationalization, optimization and, ultimately, prediction of their performance requires exploring a vast structural space of potential surface‐analyte complexes, further complicated by the presence of various defects and functionalities within the infinite graphene lattice. This immense number of systems and their periodic nature greatly limit the choice of computational tools applicable at a reasonable cost. An alternative approach using finite nanoflake models opens the doors to many more advanced and accurate electronic structure methods, while sacrificing the realism of representation. Locating the surface‐analyte complex is followed by an in‐depth in silico analysis of its energetic and electronic properties using, for example, energy decomposition schemes, as well as simulation of the signal, for example, a zero‐bias transmission spectra or a current–voltage curve, by means of the nonequilibrium Green's function method. These and other properties are examined in the context of a sensor's selectivity, sensitivity, and limit of detection with an aim to establish design principles for future devices. Herein, we analyze the advantages and limitations of diverse computational chemistry methods used at each of these steps in simulating graphene‐based electrochemical sensors. We present outstanding challenges toward predictive models and sketch possible solutions involving such contemporary techniques as multiscale simulations and high‐throughput screening.</p><p>This article is categorized under: </p><ul class="plain-list"><li>Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science</li><li>Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory</li><li>Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods</li></ul>

Robust chemical analysis with graphene chemosensors and machine learning

Recent Advances in Aptasensors Based on Graphene and Graphene-Like Nanomaterials.

Wafer-scale graphene field-effect transistor biosensor arrays with monolithic CMOS readout

Machine learning-enabled graphene-based electronic olfaction sensors and their olfactory performance assessment

Sensing at the Surface of Graphene Field-Effect Transistors.

Sensing and sensitivity: Computational chemistry of graphene‐based sensors

Graphene FET Biochip on PCB Reinforced by Machine Learning for Ultrasensitive Parallel Detection of Multiple Antibiotics in Water

Integrated biosensor platform based on graphene transistor arrays for real-time high-accuracy ion sensing

Graphene field-effect transistors for sensing ion-channel coupled receptors: towards biohybrid nanoelectronics for chemical detection

2D graphene-based advanced nanoarchitectonics for electrochemical biosensors: Applications in cancer biomarker detection

Graphene Field‐Effect Transistors for Sensing Ion‐Channel Coupled Receptors: Toward Biohybrid Nanoelectronics for Chemical Detection

Synergism between Graphene and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Developing Electrochemical Sensors for Agri-Food and Environmental Analyses

Challenges for Field-Effect-Transistor-Based Graphene Biosensors

Using Machine Learning to Overcome Interfering Oxygen Effects in a Graphene Volatile Organic Compound Sensor

Ultrasensitive Field-Effect Biosensors Enabled by the Unique Electronic Properties of Graphene

Digital Biosensing by Foundry-Fabricated Graphene Sensors

Graphene-based Electronic Biosensors

Recent Advances in Graphene Field‐Effect Transistor Toward Biological Detection

Surface-tailored graphene channels

Graphene Transistors for In Vitro Detection of Health Biomarkers

Electrolyte-Gated Graphene Field Effect Transistor-Based Ca2+ Detection Aided by Machine Learning