Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome

Shu Liu,Zhao Wang,Rongxin Chen,Xueding Wang,Xiaojie Fang,Zhuojia Chen,Shaoxing Guan,Tao Liu,Tongyu Lin,Min Huang,He Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.788824
IF: 5.6
2022-01-26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Abstract:Individual variations in concentrations of rituximab in different B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes and their relevance to efficacy were still unclear. From 2016 to 2021, a prospective clinical trial was conducted, and 510 samples with 6 uncommon subtypes of B-cell lymphoma were enrolled to examine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rituximab and its impact on clinical outcomes, including complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Considerable variability was observed in the rituximab trough concentration in the first cycle (C 1-trough , 1.16–55.52 μg/ml) in patients with different lymphoma subtypes. Patients with “double-hit” lymphoma (4.01 ± 0.77 μg/ml) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 15.65 ± 16.45 μg/ml) had much lower C 1-trough and worse outcomes. Great individual variation in the C 1-trough existed among patients with mucosa-associated lymphoma (MALT), and the high C 1-trough observed in patients treated with the RB regimen was associated with a better response than was obtained with R-CHOP (38.41 ± 14.13 μg/ml vs 15.49 ± 8.80 μg/ml, p = 0.0029). Despite the high aggressiveness of the cancer, Burkitt lymphoma patients receiving intensive chemotherapy had the highest C 1-trough (28.85 ± 9.35 μg/ml) and maintained long-term PFS. The C 1-trough in patients with mixed, unclassifiable B-cell lymphoma was close to 20 μg/ml, and these patients had acceptable outcomes. Overall, a low rituximab C 1-trough was associated with adverse consequences, including persistent progression, early recurrence and a short OS, however, some high-risk factors appeared to be balanced by the presence of a high C 1-trough . Basal levels of circulating CD19 + lymphocytes differed between and within patients with diverse lymphoma subtypes and were negatively correlated with C 1-trough . Therefore, the traditional doses of rituximab are inadequate for patients with “double-hit” lymphoma and MCL. Increasing the initial rituximab dose according to the disease, high-risk factors and even the baseline CD19 + lymphocyte count will be new methods to optimize therapeutic regimens for patients with different lymphoma subtypes.
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?