Abstract:Background: Novel strategies for anaerobic bacterial isolations from human faecal samples and various initiatives to generate culture collections of gut-derived bacteria have instigated considerable interest for the development of novel microbiota-based treatments. Early in the process of building a culture collection, optimal faecal sample preservation is essential to safeguard the viability of the broadest taxonomic diversity range possible. In contrast to the much more established faecal storage conditions for meta-omics applications, the impact of stool sample preservation conditions on bacterial growth recovery and isolation remains largely unexplored. In this study, aliquoted faecal samples from eleven healthy human volunteers selected based on a range of physicochemical and microbiological gradients were cryopreserved at - 80 °C either without the addition of any medium (dry condition) or in different Cary-Blair medium conditions with or without a cryoprotectant, i.e. 20% (v/v) glycerol or 5% (v/v) DMSO. Faecal aliquots were subjected to bulk 16S rRNA gene sequencing as well as dilution plating on modified Gifu Anaerobic Medium after preservation for culturable fraction profiling and generation of bacterial culture collections. Results: Analyses of compositional variation showed that cryopreservation medium conditions affected quantitative recovery but not the overall community composition of cultured fractions. Post-preservation sample dilution and richness of the uncultured source samples were the major drivers of the cultured fraction richness at genus level. However, preservation conditions differentially affected recovery of specific genera. Presence-absence analysis indicated that twenty-two of the 45 most abundant common genera (>0.01% abundance, dilution 10-4) were recovered in cultured fractions from all preservation conditions, while nine genera were only detected in fractions from a single preservation condition. Overall, the highest number of common genera (i.e. 35/45) in cultured fractions were recovered from sample aliquots preserved without medium and in the presence of Cary-Blair medium containing 5% (v/v) DMSO. Also, in the culture collection generated from the cultured fractions, these two preservation conditions yielded the highest species richness (72 and 66, respectively). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that preservation methods partly determine richness and taxonomic diversity of gut anaerobes recovered from faecal samples. Complementing the current standard practice of cryopreserving stool samples in dry conditions with other preservation conditions, such as Cary-Blair medium with DMSO, could increase the species diversity of gut-associated culture collections. Video abstract.

Assessment of Faecal Microbiota Transplant Stability in Deep‐Freeze Conditions: A 12‐Month Ex Vivo Viability Analysis

Evaluation of Bacterial Viability for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Impact of Thawing Temperature and Storage Time

Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods

Simple faecal preparation and efficacy of frozen inoculum in faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection--an observational cohort study

Evaluating live microbiota biobanking using an ex vivo microbiome assay and metaproteomics

Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions

High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria

IDDF2019-ABS-0191 Initial experience of faecal microbiota transplantation with frozen stools for the treatment of recurrent or refractory clostridioides difficile infection – a retrospective review from a quaternary referral centre in hong kong

Effect of cryopreservation medium conditions on growth and isolation of gut anaerobes from human faecal samples

Lower endoscopic delivery of freeze-dried intestinal microbiota results in more rapid and efficient engraftment than oral administration

Storage of equine faecal microbiota transplantation solution has minimal impact on major bacterial communities and structure

Stool Banking for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Methods and Operations at a Large Stool Bank

Overcoming donor variability and risks associated with fecal microbiota transplants through bacteriophage-mediated treatments

The Establishment and Composition of Donor-Like Gut Microbial Community after Faecal Microbiota Transplant in Sepsis

Not All Is Lost: Resilience of Microbiome Samples to Freezer Failures and Long-term Storage

Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation

Gut microbiota differs between treatment outcomes early after fecal microbiota transplantation against recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection

IDDF2019-ABS-0157 Fecal Microbiota Transplantations Reconstitute Gut Fungal and Viral Microbiota in Graft-Versus-host Disease

Impact of Clinical and Pharmacological Parameters on Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Outcome in Clostridioides difficile Infections: Results of a 5‐Year French National Survey

Domestic freezer storage: a solution for preserving stool microbiota integrity for at-home collection

Fecal microbiota transplantation donation: the gift that keeps on giving