The Effect of Fatigue on Wheelchair Users’ Upper Limb Muscle Coordination Patterns in Time-Frequency and Principal Component Analysis

Liping Qi,Shuo Guan,Li Zhang,Hai-Long Liu,Chang-Kai Sun,Martin Ferguson-Pell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2021.3119359
IF: 4.9
2021-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Abstract:An assessment of shoulder muscle coordination patterns is important to gain insight into muscle fatigue during wheelchair propulsion. The objective of the present study was to quantify muscle coordination changes over time during fatiguing wheelchair propulsion, as the muscles go through distinct levels of fatigue, a) non-fatigued, b) transiting to fatigue and c) fatigued to exhaustion. We recorded surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of the anterior deltoid (AD), middle deltoid (MD), posterior deltoid (PD), infraspinatus (IS), upper trapezius (UT), sternal head of the pectoralis major (PM), biceps brachii (BB), and triceps brachii (TB) during a wheelchair incremental exercise test. Nine wheelchair users with a diagnosis of spina bifida or T6-T12 spinal cord injury volunteered for the study. Oxygen uptake and SmartWheel kinetic parameters were also recorded during the test. EMG signals were processed by wavelet and principal component analysis (PCA), allowing for an assessment of how wheelchair users modify their muscle coordination patterns over time. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were conducted to identify the main effect of fatigue levels on muscle coordination patterns by controlling for the effect of increased workload as covariate. A significant effect of fatigue levels on the PC1 and PC3 loading scores was found after controlling for the effect of increasing workloads (with <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="8.492ex" height="2.509ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex; margin-left: -0.089ex;" viewBox="-38.5 -791.3 3656.1 1080.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-70" x="0" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-3C" x="781" y="0"></use><g transform="translate(1837,0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-30"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2E" x="500" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-30" x="779" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-35" x="1279" y="0"></use></g></g></svg></span> both cases). In addition, PC3 reflects the most dominant fatigue effect on muscle coordination patterns which are not affected by increased ergometer workload. PC3 indicates muscle imbalance when muscles are fully fatigued and muscle co-contraction when muscles are beginning to fatigue. We conclude that fatigue-related changes in neuromuscular activit- during wheelchair propulsion contribute to muscle imbalance and reflect a strategy of stiffening the shoulder joint.<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-70" d="M23 287Q24 290 25 295T30 317T40 348T55 381T75 411T101 433T134 442Q209 442 230 378L240 387Q302 442 358 442Q423 442 460 395T497 281Q497 173 421 82T249 -10Q227 -10 210 -4Q199 1 187 11T168 28L161 36Q160 35 139 -51T118 -138Q118 -144 126 -145T163 -148H188Q194 -155 194 -157T191 -175Q188 -187 185 -190T172 -194Q170 -194 161 -194T127 -193T65 -192Q-5 -192 -24 -194H-32Q-39 -187 -39 -183Q-37 -156 -26 -148H-6Q28 -147 33 -136Q36 -130 94 103T155 350Q156 355 156 364Q156 405 131 405Q109 405 94 377T71 316T59 280Q57 278 43 278H29Q23 284 23 287ZM178 102Q200 26 252 26Q282 26 310 49T356 107Q374 141 392 215T411 325V331Q411 405 350 405Q339 405 328 402T306 393T286 380T269 365T254 350T243 336T235 326L232 322Q232 321 229 308T218 264T204 212Q178 106 178 102Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-3C" d="M694 -11T694 -19T688 -33T678 -40Q671 -40 524 29T234 166L90 235Q83 240 83 250Q83 261 91 266Q664 540 678 540Q681 540 687 534T694 519T687 505Q686 504 417 376L151 250L417 124Q686 -4 687 -5Q694 -11 694 -19Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-30" d="M96 585Q152 666 249 666Q297 666 345 640T423 548Q460 465 460 320Q460 165 417 83Q397 41 362 16T301 -15T250 -22Q224 -22 198 -16T137 16T82 83Q39 165 39 320Q39 494 96 585ZM321 597Q291 629 250 629Q208 629 178 597Q153 571 145 525T137 333Q137 175 145 125T181 46Q209 16 250 16Q290 16 318 46Q347 76 354 130T362 333Q362 478 354 524T321 597Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-2E" d="M78 60Q78 84 95 102T138 120Q162 120 180 104T199 61Q199 36 182 18T139 0T96 17T78 60Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-35" d="M164 157Q164 133 148 117T109 101H102Q148 22 224 22Q294 22 326 82Q345 115 345 210Q345 313 318 349Q292 382 260 382H254Q176 382 136 314Q132 307 129 306T114 304Q97 304 95 310Q93 314 93 485V614Q93 664 98 664Q100 666 102 666Q103 666 123 658T178 642T253 634Q324 634 389 662Q397 666 402 666Q410 666 410 648V635Q328 538 205 538Q174 538 149 544L139 546V374Q158 388 169 396T205 412T256 420Q337 420 393 355T449 201Q449 109 385 44T229 -22Q148 -22 99 32T50 154Q50 178 61 192T84 210T107 214Q132 214 148 197T164 157Z"></path></defs></svg>
engineering, biomedical,rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?