Abstract:The original experiments reconstituting GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding were carried out under "nonpermissive" conditions, where the chaperonin system was absolutely required and substrate proteins could not achieve the native state if diluted directly from denaturant into solution. Under "permissive" conditions, however, employing lower substrate concentration and lower temperature, some substrate proteins can be refolded both by the chaperonin system and while free in solution. For several of these, the protein refolds more rapidly inside the GroEL-GroES cis chamber than free in solution, suggesting that the chamber may have an active role in assisting protein folding. Here, we observe that the difference is caused by reversible multimolecular association while folding in solution, an avenue of kinetic partitioning that slows the overall rate of renaturation relative to the chaperonin chamber, where such associations cannot occur. For Rubisco, reversible aggregation during folding in solution was observed by gel filtration. For a mutant of maltose-binding protein (DM-MBP), the rate of folding in solution declined with increasing concentration, and the folding reaction produced light scattering. Under solution conditions where chloride was absent, however, light scattering no longer occurred, and DM-MBP folded at the same rate as in the cis cavity. In a further test, dihydrofolate reductase, thermally inactivated in the cis cavity or in solution, was substantially reactivated upon temperature downshift in the cis cavity but not in solution, where aggregation occurred. We conclude that the GroEL-GroES chamber behaves as a passive "Anfinsen cage" whose primary role is to prevent multimolecular association during folding.

Tight Hydrophobic Contacts with the SecB Chaperone Prevent Folding of Substrate Proteins

Thermodynamics of Substrate Binding to the Chaperone SecB

Diffusion-Limited Interaction between Unfolded Polypeptides and the Escherichia coli Chaperone SecB

The interaction between the chaperone SecB and its ligands: Evidence for multiple subsites for binding

Structural basis for the antifolding activity of a molecular chaperone

Influence of impaired chaperone or secretion function on SecB production in Escherichia coli

SecB, one small chaperone in the complex milieu of the cell

Sites of interaction between SecA and the chaperone SecB, two proteins involved in export

Calorimetric analyses of the interaction between SecB and its ligands

Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation

SecB, a molecular chaperone with two faces

Binding and Folding of the Small Bacterial Chaperone HdeA

Probing the quality control mechanism of the Escherichia coli twin-arginine translocase with folding variants of a de novo–designed heme protein

Mutations of the molecular chaperone protein SecB which alter the interaction between SecB and maltose-binding protein.

Multitasking SecB chaperones in bacteria

Recognition of ligands by SecB, a molecular chaperone involved in bacterial protein export

Folding while bound to chaperones

Hsp33 controls elongation factor-Tu stability and allows Escherichia coli growth in the absence of the major DnaK and trigger factor chaperones

Resolving chaperone-assisted protein folding on the ribosome at the peptide level

Control of folding and membrane translocation by binding of the chaperone DnaJ to nascent polypeptides.