Abstract:Developing a suitable index for Waste Load Allocation (WLA) is essential for both industrial polluters and environmental organizations. Identifying the index that best describes the quality conditions of the river is the main concern of this study. To achieve this purpose, a novel framework incorporating a regret-based index and a bankruptcy-based approach to address the impacts of low water quality and pollutant locations within the WLA are introduced. The framework includes a simulation–optimization model to minimize river quality regret for environmental organizations and total treatment cost for industrial polluters, employing Nash bargaining theory for conflict resolution. Additionally, a new bankruptcy approach, the Namin's rule, is proposed for redistributing the River Quality Regret Index among industrial polluters. Applying this methodology to data from the KhoramAbad River, a sensitivity analysis reveals that while there is no significant difference between the methodology and fuzzy risk when polluters are close, the methodology provides more accurate results as the distance between polluters increases. When the distance between two pollutants was 20 km, the sum of WLA was evaluated to be 300 kg per day higher than that in the compared method, potentially enhancing environmental justice.

A novel integration of regret-based methodology and bankruptcy theory for waste load allocation