Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for perinatal maternal depression, anxiety and stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Xinyuan Li,David P Laplante,Vincent Paquin,Sandra Lafortune,Guillaume Elgbeili,Suzanne King,David P. Laplante
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102129
IF: 11.397
2022-03-01
Clinical Psychology Review
Abstract:Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been widely studied in prenatal or postnatal depression, with much less research on anxiety and stress. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate CBT efficacy for perinatal depression, anxiety and stress in the short term (from baseline to immediately post-intervention) and in the long term (from baseline to the end of follow-up). Five databases were searched. We included 79 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the efficacy of CBT during pregnancy and the first year postpartum. Primary outcome was the mean score change in depression, anxiety and stress. CBT-only and CBT plus other interventions were effective for perinatal maternal depression in the short term (SMD -0.69, 95% CI: -0.83, -0.55) and long term (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -0.75, -0.42). CBT-only had both short- and long-term efficacy for perinatal anxiety (short term: SMD -0.63, 95% CI -0.85, -0.42; long term: SMD -0.71, 95% CI -1.02, -0.39) and short-term efficacy for perinatal stress (SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.40, -0.52). Overall, CBT was effective for perinatal maternal depression, anxiety and stress. CBT-only exhibited short-term efficacy for perinatal depression, anxiety and stress, and long-term efficacy for perinatal depression and anxiety. Subgroup analyses suggested that CBT-only was effective across a wide variety of modalities.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?