Poisonous Higher Plants

Doreen Grace Lang,R. A. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351072090-3

2019-08-08

Abstract:In the first edition one of us (RAS) pointed out the remarkable association between plant families as determined by taxonomic botany and the toxins that they contained as organized by chemists. At that time I pointed out that a veritable plethora of plant toxins was found in the Leguminosae; since then the botanists themselves have renamed the family the Fabaceae and have now recognized three subfamilies: the Mimosoideae, the Papilonoideae, and the Caesalpinoideae. Where possible we have given the subfamily for toxic members of the Fabaceae. On reading the present chapter, I find myself wondering about the plethora of toxins in two more families, the Ranunculaceae and the Solanaceae. Only time will tell if these two will come to be divided into subfamilies. The authors from whom we have taken most guidance are Cronquist and Gleason (1991), Kingsbury (1964) and Heywood (1993). Cronquist was, and Heywood is, primarily a botanist with little interest in phytotoxicology. Most readers will be familiar with Kingsbury (a botanist first and a phytotoxicologist second), who considered only poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Cronquist deals at great length with all of the vascular plants of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Heywood, on the other hand, who discusses the flowering plants of the world, is short on detail, but manages to cover the flowering flora globally. The previous grouping of plants into divisions has been dropped in favor of a system based on families alone, arranged in alphabetical order. This will, hopefully, make the book more useful to poison control centers and some other readers.