Abstract:The view of political achievements suggests that officials will prefer to implement measures that benefit their own development in order to seek promotions. In the past, GDP weighed heavily in officials’ appraisals, leading them to develop the economy without regard to sustainability. Now that the central government has incorporated environmental indicators into the officials’ appraisal system, will this lead officials to implement sustainable development strategies to the fullest extent? Are there spillover effects and regional heterogeneity in this role? This paper discusses these questions with the help of entropy method and a spatial Durbin model using data of 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2006 to 2016. The conclusions show that, firstly, the officials’ competitive pressure is beneficial to enhance the sustainable development capacity of the province, but this effect is only effective in western China. Secondly, there is no spillover effect of officials’ competitive pressure on sustainable development capacity; thirdly, foreign direct investment, the proportion of state-owned enterprises and environmental regulations have their own unique effects on sustainable development capacity, and there are spillover effects. Based on these findings, this paper proposes corresponding policy recommendations in terms of officials’ appraisal system, talent training, foreign investment introduction, and state-owned enterprise reform.

The higher‐ranking local officials and local economic growth: Evidence from China

Can officials with mismatched higher administrative rank promote local economic development?——evidence from the prefecture-level cities in China

Local Political Chief Turnover and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

Land Management Strategy of Local Government, Competition Mechanism and China’s Urban Hierarchy from the Spatial Perspective:An Empirical Analysis based on the 186 Cities in China

Does Administrative Decentralization Enhance Economic Growth? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

The M-form Hierarchy and China's Economic Reform

How Local Leaders Matter: Inter-provincial Leadership Transfers and Land Transactions in China

Local Officials and Regional FDI: An Empirical Study Based on Difference-in-Difference Estimation

Resources Coupled with Executive Authority: Implications of Relocating Government Administrative Headquarters for Local Economic Development

Subnational Leaders and Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Cities

China's Local Political Turnover in the Twenty-First Century

Strategic Interaction in Political Competition: Evidence from Spatial Effects Across Chinese Cities

Do environmental target constraints of local government affect high-quality economic development? Evidence from China

Personnel Control and Local Officials’ Attention to Economic Development: Evidence from China

Promotion Pressures of Local Leaders and Real Estate Investments: China and Leader Heterogeneity

Promotion prospects and policy choice: evidence from the land market in China

How Officials’ Competitive Pressure Affects Sustainable Development Capacity From a Spatial Perspective: Empirical Evidence From China

Political Hierarchy and Long-Term Effects on TFP: Evidence from a Provincial Elevation in China

Promotion incentives, economic growth targets and industrial land supply: evidence from China

The Impact of Local Economic Growth Target Setting on the Quality of Public Occupational Health: Evidence From Provincial and City Government Work Reports in China

The Quality of Local Government and Firm Performance: The Case of China's Provinces