Abstract:The last fifteen years have witnessed radical reforms in the Chinese college admissions system, with many provinces moving from the “sequential” (Immediate Acceptance) to various versions of the “parallel” college admissions mechanisms. We evaluate the old and new mechanisms both in the laboratory and with naturally-occurring data. In the laboratory, we find that the more emphasis a mechanism puts on the first choice, the more likely students rely on their rankings in the test to manipulate their reported preferences. We also find that the Deferred Acceptance mechanism is more stable than the parallel mechanism, which is in turn more stable than the Immediate Acceptance mechanism. Using naturally-occurring data from a county in Sichuan Province, we find that, in the year after the province adopted the parallel mechanism, students list more colleges in their rank-ordered list, and more prestigious colleges as their first choices; furthermore, they are less likely to list local colleges as their first choices. At the outcome level, fewer students were admitted to their reported first choices, whereas we do not find significant difference in matching stability. In sum, both laboratory and field data indicate that the parallel mechanism is less manipulable than its Immediate Acceptance predecessor.

Modifications of Boston, Taiwanese and Chinese mechanisms are not comparable via counting manipulating students

School Choice: an Experimental Study.

Trade-offs in School Choice: Comparing Deferred Acceptance, the Naive and the Classic Boston Mechanism

From Boston to Shanghai to Deferred Acceptance: Theory and Experiments on a Family of School Choice Mechanisms

Preference Submission Timing in School Choice Matching: Testing Fairness and Efficiency in the Laboratory

Fairness of the Boston Matching Mechanism in China's College Admissions

Timing is Everything ? An Experimental Investigation of Incomplete Information in Centralized Matching Mechanisms

Sophisticated Students in Boston Mechanism and Gale-Shapley Algorithm for School Choice Problem

Matching inequality and strategic behavior under the Boston mechanism: Evidence from China's college admissions

Robustness to manipulations in school choice

Chinese College Admissions Reforms : Experimental and Empirical Evaluations

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: A Theoretical Analysis

Chinese College Admissions and School Choice Reforms: an Experimental Study

Multi-District School Choice: Playing on Several Fields

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top School in China

Ex-Ante Fairness under Constrained School Choice: an Experimental Approach

School Choice: An Experimental Study (Vol 127, Pg 202, 2006)

Causal Effects in Matching Mechanisms with Strategically Reported Preferences

Ex-Ante Fairness in the Boston and Serial Dictatorship Mechanisms under Pre-Exam and Post-Exam Preference Submission

Reforms meet fairness concerns in school and college admissions

Matching Mechanisms and Matching Quality: Evidence from a Top University in China.