Abstract:The importance of downside risk cannot be denied. In this study, we have replaced beta in the five-factor model of using downside beta and have added a momentum factor to suggest a new six-factor downside beta capital asset pricing model (CAPM). Two models are tested—a beta- and momentum-based six-factor model and a downside-beta- (proxy of downside risk) and momentum-based six-factor model. Beta and downside beta are highly correlated; therefore, portfolios are double-sorted to disentangle the correlation. Factor loadings, i.e., size, value, momentum, profitability, and investment, are constructed. The standard methodologies are applied. Data for sample stocks from different non-financial sectors listed in the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) are taken from January 2000 to December 2018. The PSX-100 index and three-month T-bills are taken as proxies for market and risk-free returns. The study uses three subsamples for robustness—period of very high volatility, period of stability, and period of stability and growth with volatility. The results show that the value factor is redundant in both models. The momentum factor is rejected in the beta-based six-factor model only. The beta-based six-factor model shows very low R2 in periods of highly volatility. The R2 is high for the other periods. In contrast, the downside beta six-factor model captures the downside trend of the market in an effective manner with a relatively high R2. The risk–return relationship is stronger for the downside beta model. These reasons lead us to believe that, overall, the downside beta six-factor model is a better option for investors as compared to the beta-based six-factor model in the area of asset pricing models.

Realized semibetas in the Australian stock market

Price Nonsynchronicity, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Expected Stock Returns in China

Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns Around the World

Beware of the Crash Risk: Tail Beta and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in China

An empirical evaluation of the salience-based asset pricing model: Evidence from Australia

Semivariance Premium and Expected Stock Returns

Prospect Theory and Stock Market Anomalies

New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Is Beta Still Useful Over a Longer-Horizon?

An Empirical Test of CAPM—The Case of Indian Stock Market

Downside Risk-Based Six-Factor Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): A New Paradigm in Asset Pricing

Comparison Study on Asset Pricing Model in Chinese Stock Market: CAPM and Fama-French Model

Can intraday data improve the joint estimation and prediction of risk measures? Evidence from a variety of realized measures

Is Beta Still Useful over a Longer-Horizon?: An Implied Cost of Capital Approach

The Capital Assets Pricing Model Based on Attitude to One-Side Risk and Its Empirical Test

Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia

Research On Beta Of Listed Real Estate Companies In China

Financing anomaly, mispricing and cross-sectional return predictability

An Empirical Study of Capital Asset Pricing Model based on Chinese A-share Trading Data

Betting Against Low Nominal Prices: Evidence from China

Can Investor Sentiment Explain the Abnormal Returns of Volatility-Managed Portfolio Strategy? Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market