Relative importance of repeated vaccine doses and prior infection on SARS-CoV-2 XBB infection

Tsang,N. N. Y.,So,H. C.,Cowling,B. J.,Leung,G. M.,Ip,D. K. M.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4325
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:In COVID-19 pandemic, individuals had repeated infections and repeated vaccination, receiving four doses or more within year. A robust examination on this unprecedented practice of repeated booster doses and prior infection would be needed. A prospective cohort of 10234 individuals aged 5 years and older with and without omicron BA.2 infection in Hong Kong, did weekly testing, regardless of symptom and exposure status during the XBB wave (February 13 - May 7, 2023). The protective effect of natural infection and 4th dose vaccination was estimated with a Cox proportional hazards regression model with time-dependent covariates, allowing for changes in vaccination status over time, after adjustment for demographic factors and chronic conditions. Compared to individuals having no prior infection nor 4th dose, having a prior infection provided a significant protection of 62% (95%CI:51,71) against asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 omicron XBB infection. Receiving a 4th dose in addition to prior infection tended to have a protective effectiveness of 83% (–20,98). Receiving a 4th dose per se without a prior infection, however, was associated with a significant high hazard of infections (–82%, 95%CI:-210,-7, p=0.03). Compared to 3rd dose, VE for the second booster becomes practically non-significant or negative. Our findings indicated that prior BA.2 infection conferred the most substantial protection against SARS-CoV-2 XBB infection, including mild and asymptomatic cases. Further study on the additional effect of repeated vaccine doses on emerging variants over time are warranted.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?