Reliability and validity of the Munro Scale on the assessment of pressure ulcer risks in adult perioperative patients : a cross-sectional study

Xiuni Gan,Jia-cai Tang,Dongxue Li
Abstract:Background: The Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale (Munro Scale) for adult perioperative patients is the world’s first scale for surgical patients, but it’s suitability for evaluating the PU risk in Chinese patients remains unknown. Objectives: To test the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Munro Scale in adult perioperative patients. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: A 15-bed operating room in a 1500-bed teaching hospital in Chongqing, China. Subjects: A total of 246 surgical patients were enrolled through convenience sampling, and were surveyed at the hospital from July 2016 to March 2017. Methods: A Chinese version of the Munro Scale was developed using Brislin’s translation model, including double back-translation and cultural adaptation. The inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, content validity, and construct validity were established. Results: The inter-rater reliability was confirmed through the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), which ranged from 0.786 to 1.0, and the ICC of the total score was 0.954 (95% CI, 0.929-0.971). The internal consistency was established through the Cronbach’s α coefficient analysis (α = 0.400 for the whole scale). The item-level content validity index (ICVI) ranged from 0.6 to 1.0, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.947. Six factors were extracted by the exploratory factor analysis, and these factors explained 61.141% of the total variance, as the basic dimensions of each corresponding item had higher factor loading. Conclusions: The Chinese version of the Munro Scale showed a high degree of inter-rater reliability, high content validity, and acceptable construct validity.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?