The diagnostic efficiency of artificial intelligence based 2 hours Holter monitoring in premature ventricular and supraventricular contractions detection

Qiong Huang,Yuansheng Fan,Jialin Wang,Zhiyang Xu,Linfeng Yang,Junhong Wang,Yiyang Zhan,Xiangqing Kong,Ningtian Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.24266
2024-04-10
Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:This study compared an artificial intelligence (AI) (convolutional neural network [CNN])‐based 2 hours single‐lead Holter and a traditional 24 hours Holter for premature supraventricular contraction (PSVC)/premature ventricular contraction (PVC) detection. The two methods showed good diagnostic consistency. In conclusion, the AI‐based 2 hours single‐lead Holter improved the PSVC/PVC detection efficiency, shortened the wearing period, and provided new insights for future arrhythmia diagnosis. Background Electrocardiography (ECG) and 24 hours Holter monitoring (24 h‐Holter) provided valuable information for premature ventricular and supraventricular contractions (PVC and PSVC). Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) based 2 hours single‐lead Holter (2 h‐Holter) monitoring may provide an improved strategy for PSVC/PVC diagnosis. Hypothesis AI combined with single‐lead Holter monitoring improves PSVC/PVC detection. Methods In total, 170 patients were enrolled between August 2022 and 2023. All patients wore both devices simultaneously; then, we compared diagnostic efficiency, including the sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive‐value (PPV) and negative predictive‐value (NPV) in detecting PSVC/PVC by 24 h‐Holter and 2 h‐Holter. Results The PPV and NPV in patients underwent 2 h‐Holter were 76.00%/87.50% and 96.35%/98.55, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity were 79.17%/91.30%, and 95.65%/97.84% in PSVC/PVC detection compared with 24 h‐Holter. The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for PSVC and PVC were 0.885 and 0.741, respectively (p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?