Abstract:Importance Investigating racial and ethnic discrimination in medical education is crucial for addressing disparities and fostering an inclusive environment. Objective To assess how racial and ethnic discrimination in medical school is associated with personal and professional identity formation (PPIF) by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cross-sectional study used deidentified data on 37 610 medical students who matriculated in 2014 or 2015 and took the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) between 2016 and 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1 to November 20, 2023. Exposures Experiences of racial and ethnic discrimination were assessed through responses to 3 GQ questions about denial of opportunities, offensive remarks or names, and lower evaluations or grades due to race or ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures Personal and professional development were measured as 2 separate outcomes using 2 GQ statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale (where 1 indicated strongly disagree and 5 indicated strongly agree): "My medical school has done a good job fostering and nurturing my development as a person" and "My medical school has done a good job fostering and nurturing my development as a physician." Variables of personal and professional development were both dichotomized. Results Of 37 610 medical students, 18 200 (48.4%) were female, and 19 410 (51.6%) were male; 2458 (6.5%) were African American or Black, 7801 (20.7%) were Asian, 2430 (6.5%) were Hispanic, 21 380 (56.9%) were White, 2404 (6.4%) were multiracial, and 1137 (3%) were other race or ethnicity. Most respondents attested that their medical school fostered their personal (27 272 [72.5%]) and professional (34 560 [91.9%]) development. African American or Black students reported the lowest rates of personal (1603 of 2458 [65.2%]) and professional (2182 of 2458 [88.8%]) development, and experienced lower likelihoods of personal (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.93]) and professional (ARR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.94-0.97]) development than White students. Racial discrimination was inversely associated with development, with the highest PPIF rates among those never experiencing discrimination (personal, 25 089 of 33 508 [74.9%]; and professional, 31 257 of 33 508 [93.3%]). Those experiencing isolated discrimination (personal: ARR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.80-0.87]; professional: ARR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]) and recurrent discrimination (personal: ARR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.60-0.66]; professional: ARR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.80-0.84]) had relatively lower likelihoods of PPIF. African American or Black students experienced the highest rate of recurrent discrimination (543 of 2458 [22.1%]). No significant PPIF risk differences were found for other racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine without discrimination compared with White students without discrimination, but all groups with recurrent discrimination had relatively lower PPIF risk. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of US medical students, racial and ethnic discrimination was associated with lower PPIF across all racial and ethnic groups compared with White students without such experiences. African American or Black students disproportionately faced this discrimination. Systemic changes in medical education are needed to combat discrimination and ensure equity in holistic student development.

Investigating racial/ethnic differences in procedure experience in obstetrics & gynecology trainees at a single academic institution: a retrospective cohort study

Evaluating the Impact of Gender and Race on Otolaryngology Resident Experiences Across the United States

Evaluating the Impact of Gender, Race, and Training Year on Internal Medicine Residents' Experiences Across the United States

The Effect of Implicit Bias on the OB/GYN Residency Application Process

Minority Resident Physicians' Views on the Role of Race/Ethnicity in Their Training Experiences in the Workplace

Assessing Attitudes and Perceptions of Unconscious Bias Experienced by Surgical Oncology Fellows

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Internal Medicine Residency Assessments

Beyond the Recruitment Pipeline: A Call to Action for Centering the Success of Under-represented Minority Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology

A National Survey of Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Perspectives on Their Preparedness to Provide Care for Underserved Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies

Intersectional Disparities in Emergency Medicine Residents' Performance Assessments by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex

"Just Because You Have Ears Doesn't Mean You Can Hear"-Perception of Racial-Ethnic Discrimination During Childbirth

The time is now: addressing implicit bias in obstetrics and gynecology education

Race, Ethnicity, and Sex Representation Trends among Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellowship Trainees and Graduates

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Otolaryngology Applicants and Residents: Recruiting a Diverse Workforce

Racial and Ethnic Discrimination and Medical Students' Identity Formation

Clinical Trial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

Trends in Operative Case Logs of Chief Residents in Surgery by Sex and Race

Racial and Ethnic Bias in Medical School Clinical Grading: A Review

Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?

ACOG Committee Statement No. 10: Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Exploring Diversity in North American Academic Pediatric Otolaryngology