Biofilm in Bacterial Vaginosis: A Legitimate Therapeutic Challenge?

Jack D Sobel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae135
2024-04-30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Found worldwide, bacterial vaginosis (BV) remains the most common vaginal infection in reproductive-age women [1]. BV is polymicrobial in nature, and understanding the pathogenesis of BV remains incomplete, though evidence supporting the role of sexual transmission has increased [2]. BV was originally considered a nuisance-type syndrome, but the last 2 decades have revealed an ever-growing list of serious complications with profound consequences: preterm delivery of low birth weight infants, fetal loss, pelvic inflammatory disease, and increased risk of sexually transmitted infections, the most important of which is HIV [1]. Underappreciated is the risk of recurrent symptomatic vaginitis, often mixed or followed by recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, with both infections incurring a considerable personal and national economic cost. Two antibiotic classes—nitroimidazoles and lincomycins, administered orally or topically with equal efficacy—have been available for 4 decades. While these achieve fairly rapid moderate rates of short-term symptom relief, unfortunately, high rates of symptomatic recurrent disease as well as chronic refractory BV are widely reported [3]. Faced with an empty treatment pipeline, patients and practitioners remain frustrated and helpless in confronting BV recurrence [4–6].
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?