nextMONARCH: Abemaciclib Monotherapy or Combined With Tamoxifen for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Erika Hamilton,Javier Cortes,Ozgur Ozyilkan,Shin-Cheh Chen,Katarina Petrakova,Aleksey Manikhas,Guy Jerusalem,Roberto Hegg,Jens Huober,Sonya C Chapman,Yi Lu,Molly C Hardebeck,Melissa M Bear,Erica L Johnston,Miguel Martin,Sonya C. Chapman,Molly C. Hardebeck,Melissa M. Bear,Erica L. Johnston
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2020.09.011
IF: 3.078
2021-06-01
Clinical Breast Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Abemaciclib is a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 &amp; 6 inhibitor administered continuously for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. Abemaciclib is associated with dose-dependent early onset diarrhea. nextMONARCH evaluated abemaciclib monotherapy (+/- prophylactic loperamide) and in combination with tamoxifen in endocrine refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following chemotherapy.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Patients/Methods</h3><p>nextMONARCH is an open-label, controlled, randomized, phase 2 study in women with endocrine refractory HR+, HER2- MBC previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients received abemaciclib 150 mg + tamoxifen 20 mg (A+T), or abemaciclib 150 mg Q12H (A-150), or abemaciclib 200 mg + prophylactic loperamide (A-200). The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). PFS analyses tested superiority of A+T to A-200 and informal noninferiority of A-150 to A-200. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Median PFS was 9.1 months for A+T versus 7.4 months for A-200 (HR=.815; 95% CI, .556-1.193; <em>P</em>=.293). A-200 PFS was comparable to A-150 at 6.5 months (HR=1.045; 95% CI, .711-1.535; <em>P</em>=.811). ORR was 34.6%, 24.1%, and 32.5% for A+T, A-150, and A-200, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. Incidence/severity of diarrhea (62.3%, grade 3: 7.8%) in A-200 was similar to A-150 (67.1%, grade 3: 3.8%). PK was comparable to previous observations.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Addition of tamoxifen to abemaciclib did not significantly improve PFS or ORR compared to abemaciclib monotherapy but confirmed single-agent activity of abemaciclib in heavily pretreated HR+, HER2- MBC. Dose reductions and antidiarrheal medication generally managed diarrhea while maintaining efficacy.</p>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?