Abstract:Abstract. Palaeoclimate model simulations are an important tool to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of climate change. These simulations also provide tests of the ability of models to simulate climates very different to today. Here we present the results from two brand-new simulations using the latest version of the UK's physical climate model, HadGEM3-GC3.1; they are the mid-Holocene (∼6 ka) and Last Interglacial (∼127 ka) simulations, both conducted under the auspices of CMIP6/PMIP4. This is the first time this version of the UK model has been used to conduct palaeoclimate simulations. These periods are of particular interest to PMIP4 because they represent the two most recent warm periods in Earth history, where atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases and continental configuration are similar to the pre-industrial period but where there were significant changes to the Earth's orbital configuration, resulting in a very different seasonal cycle of radiative forcing. Results for these simulations are assessed firstly against the same model's pre-industrial control simulation (a simulation comparison, to describe and understand the differences between the pre-industrial – PI – and the two palaeo simulations) and secondly against previous versions of the same model relative to newly available proxy data (a model–data comparison, to compare all available simulations from the same model with proxy data to assess any improvements due to model advances). The introduction of this newly available proxy data adds further novelty to this study. Globally, for metrics such as 1.5 m temperature and surface rainfall, whilst both the recent palaeoclimate simulations are mostly capturing the expected sign and, in some places, magnitude of change relative to the pre-industrial, this is geographically and seasonally dependent. Compared to newly available proxy data (including sea surface temperature – SST – and rainfall) and also incorporating data from previous versions of the model shows that the relative accuracy of the simulations appears to vary according to metric, proxy reconstruction used for comparison and geographical location. In some instances, such as mean rainfall in the mid-Holocene, there is a clear and linear improvement, relative to proxy data, from the oldest to the newest generation of the model. When zooming into northern Africa, a region known to be problematic for models in terms of rainfall enhancement, the behaviour of the West African monsoon in both recent palaeoclimate simulations is consistent with current understanding, suggesting a wetter monsoon during the mid-Holocene and (more so) the Last Interglacial, relative to the pre-industrial era. However, regarding the well-documented “Saharan greening” during the mid-Holocene, results here suggest that the most recent version of the UK's physical model is still unable to reproduce the increases suggested by proxy data, consistent with all other previous models to date.

The paleoclimate modeling intercomparison project contribution to CMIP5

Evaluating Historical Simulations of CMIP5 GCMs for Key Climatic Variables in Zhejiang Province, China

Climate model projections from the scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6

Assessment of the CMIP5 global climate model simulations of the western tropical Pacific climate system and comparison to CMIP3

The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

A transition from CMIP3 to CMIP5 for climate information providers: the case of surface temperature over eastern North America

Long-Term Climate Change Commitment And Reversibility: An Emic Intercomparison

The UK contribution to CMIP6/PMIP4: mid-Holocene and Last Interglacial experiments with HadGEM3, and comparison to the pre-industrial era and proxy data

A Robustness Analysis of CMIP5 Models over the East Asia-Western North Pacific Domain

LongRunMIP: Motivation and Design for a Large Collection of Millennial-Length AOGCM Simulations

Scenario Setup and Forcing Data for Impact Model Evaluation and Impact Attribution Within the Third Round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (Isimip3a)

Supplementary Material to &Amp;quot;large-Scale Features and Evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 &lt;i&gt;midholocene&lt;/i&gt; Simulations&quot;

Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 <i>midHolocene</i> simulations

Large-Scale Features of Pliocene Climate: Results from the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project

The computational and energy cost of simulation and storage for climate science: lessons from CMIP6

The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3461–3482

Large-scale features and evaluation of the PMIP4-CMIP6 midHolocene simulations

Large-scale Features of Last Interglacial Climate: Results from Evaluating the Lig127k Simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (cmip6)–paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4)

CMIP6/PMIP4 simulations of the mid-Holocene and Last Interglacial using HadGEM3: comparison to the pre-industrial era, previous model versions and proxy data

Large-scale features of Last Interglacial climate: results from evaluating the <i>lig127k</i> simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)–Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4)

The DeepMIP Contribution to PMIP4: Methodologies for Selection, Compilation and Analysis of Latest Paleocene and Early Eocene Climate Proxy Data, Incorporating Version 0.1 of the DeepMIP Database