Abstract:Introduction: It is known that patients with double hit (DHL) and triple hit lymphoma (THL) have a significantly worse prognosis compared to patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) without MYC rearrangement (MYC-R). Some studies have shown that DLBCL patients with MYC rearrangement only (single hit lymphoma; SHL) also have a poor prognosis similar to those with DHL/THL. However, it is not uncommon for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect extra copies (EC) of MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 in the absence of rearrangement. The potential role of these extra copies (EC) on survival has not been fully explored. In the current study, we focused on the prognostic significance of MYC-EC in comparison with MYC-R in patients with de novo DLBCL treated with rituximab-chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: A total of 664 de novo DLBCL cases with MYC/8q24, BCL2/18q21 and BCL6/3q27status confirmed by FISH and/or karyotype from 2010-2015 were included. MYC SHL, DHL and THL were identified if they had rearrangements of MYC only, both MYC and BCL2 or BCL6, or concurrent MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, respectively. Positive expression for MYC or BCL2 by immunohistochemistry was defined by >40% and >50% staining in the lymphoma cells, respectively.Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.Fisher's exact test was used to compare the clinicopathologic features.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23 software. Results: 105 DLBCL had MYC-R, 77 had MYC-EC, and 482 had no MYC abnormality (MYC-NL). The 105 MYC-R cases included 28 SHL, 45 DHL (39 MYC/BCL2 and 6 MYC/BCL6 DHL), 11 THL, and 21 with unknown BCL2 or BCL6 status. Overall, the clinicopathologic features including overall survival (OS) were similar among SHL, DHL, and THL patients (Figure 1A, p=0.92). Patients with DLBCL harboring MYC-R had more aggressive clinicopathologic features than those with MYC-EC or MYC-NL (p<0.05). There was no difference in the overall survival (OS) between patients with MYC amplification (≥5 copies) compared to those with 3-4 copies of MYC (p=0.41); as such; they were combined into to one group (designated MYC-EC) for further analysis. The features of patients with MYC-EC were largely similar to those with MYC-NL except a lower CR rate in MYC-EC group (57% vs 72% in MYC-NL, p=0.011). Although both the MYC-R and MYC-EC groups demonstrated a worse OS than MYC-NL patients (p<0.01), the MYC-EC group had a trend towards a better OS when compared with the MYC-R group (p=0.086, Figure 1B). As expected, more patients received intensive induction chemotherapy (R-EPOCH & R-Hyper-CVAD) in the MYC-R group than in the MYC-EC or MYC-NL group (p<0.01). Compared with R-CHOP, intensive induction chemotherapy showed only a trend towards better OS in the MYC-R and MYC-EC group (Figure 1C & 1D respectively). By multivariate analysis, MYC-R (HR=2.55, p=0.0001) but not MYC-EC was an independent prognostic factor in de novo DLBCL patients. Conclusion: Patients with DLBCL harboring extra copies of MYC have clinicopathologic features more in common to DLBCL patients with normal MYC status than those with MYC rearrangement. The OS in patients with DLBCL harboring extra copies of MYC was significantly worse than in DLBCL patients without MYC abnormality; however, it was not as poor as that seen in patients with DLBCL with MYC-R. Compared to R-CHOP, intensive induction regimens (R-EPOCH & R-Hyper-CVAD) showed only a trend towards better prognosis in DLBCL patients with MYC rearrangement or extra copies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Westin: Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reddy:GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; INFINITY: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Testing for t(3;8) in MYC/BCL6 re-arranged large B cell lymphoma identifies a high risk subgroup with inferior survival

Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma of Germinal Center Origin with BCL2 Translocations Have Poor Outcome, Irrespective of MYC Status: a Report from an International DLBCL Rituximab-Chop Consortium Program Study.

Clinical Features, Tumor Biology, and Prognosis Associated with MYC Rearrangement and Myc Overexpression in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Rituximab-Chop

The T(14;18)(Q32;Q21) Characterizes A Subset of Patients with Diffuse Large-B Cell Lymphoma of Germinal Center Origin with Poor Outcome: Report from the International Dlbcl Rituximab-Chop Consortium Program Study

MYC/BCL2 Protein Co-Expression Defines a Unique Subset of Aggressive Lymphoma and Contributes to the Inferior Prognosis of Activated B-cell Subtype of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Report from the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study

MYC/BCL2 protein coexpression contributes to the inferior survival of activated B cell subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and demonstrates high risk gene expression …

Prognostic Significance and Phenotypic Manifestations of MYC/BCL2 Protein Expression in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) with Extranodal Organ Involvement: A Report of the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study

MYC/BCL2 Protein Coexpression Contributes to the Inferior Survival of Activated B-cell Subtype of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Demonstrates High-Risk Gene Expression Signatures: a Report from the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program.

Prognostic impact of concurrent MYC and BCL6 rearrangements and expression in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Motive and Opportunity: MYC rearrangements in high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements-an LLMPP study

Preferential clustering of chromosomal breakpoints in Burkitt's lymphomas and L3 type acute lymphoblastic leukemias with a t(8;14) translocation

MYC/BCL2/BCL6 triple hit lymphoma: a study of 40 patients with a comparison to MYC/BCL2 and MYC/BCL6 double hit lymphomas

Triple-hit B-cell Lymphoma With MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 Translocations/Rearrangements: Clinicopathologic Features of 11 Cases.

The clinical presentation and prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with t(14;18) and 8q24/c-MYC rearrangement

BCL2 translocation defines a unique tumor subset within the germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

A novel five-way translocation, t(3;9;13;8;14)(q27;p13;q32;q24;q32), with concurrent MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in a primary bone marrow B-cell lymphoma

MYC Copy Number Aberrancies Predict a Worse Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Non-IG::MYC in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma confers variable genomic configurations and MYC transactivation potential

Distinct genetic changes reveal evolutionary history and heterogeneous molecular grade of DLBCL with MYC/BCL2 double-hit

Mantle cell lymphomas with concomitant MYC and CCND1 breakpoints are recurrently TdT positive and frequently show high-grade pathological and genetic features

MYC -rearranged mature B-cell lymphomas in children and young adults are molecularly Burkitt Lymphoma