Abstract:Background and Purpose: Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an evidence-based strategy to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We have previously reported that a multi-level mailed FIT intervention resulted in higher CRC screening rates compared to usual care among Hispanic patients receiving care at Community Health Centers (CHCs). The objective of this study was to assess predictors of mailed FIT completion among Hispanic individuals. Methods: The San Diego Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) project tested a multi-level mailed FIT intervention in 3 CHC systems in Southern California. Using a cluster-randomized trial design, 9 clinics were randomized to mailed FIT and 16 to usual care. The intervention was delivered in Spanish and English and included an invitation letter, a mailed FIT kit with completion instructions, and phone and text-based reminders. Multi-level implementation strategies (i.e., training, centralized facilitation, etc.) were utilized to increase uptake. For this analysis, we assessed mailed FIT completion at 1 year among Hispanic participants ages 50-75 years not up-to-date with CRC screening at baseline and who were randomized to clinics in the mailed FIT intervention. We conducted logistic regression to assess relationships between sex, language preference, health insurance and mailed FIT return. Results: Among the 9 intervention clinics, 2,199 Hispanic patients who were age-eligible and not up-to-date with CRC screening at baseline were included in the present analysis. In this group, 1,457 (66.3%) were female, 1,449 (65.9%) were Spanish-speaking, and 769 (35.0%) returned the FIT kit. Variation in FIT return for Hispanic individuals was shown across CHC systems: 53.2% in CHC1, 31.4% in CHC2, and 24.7% in CHC3. The percentage of individuals who returned the mailed FIT was highest among 55 to 59-year-olds (39.4%) and lowest among 50 to 54-year-olds (30.6%). Results from univariate logistic regression showed that individuals who preferred Spanish language had higher return rate than those who preferred English (OR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.17-1.77). FIT return was higher among participants who were privately insured compared with Medicaid-insured individuals (OR=1.57; 95% CI: 1.20-2.06). Return rate was higher among females compared to males, but the difference was not statistically significant (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.98-1.29). Conclusions: Among Hispanic patients who receive care at CHCs, a regional mailed FIT intervention was effective at increasing screening rates. Mailed FIT completion among participants randomized to clinics in the intervention group varied by language preference and health insurance status. These results suggest that future efforts could be tailored to increase FIT return rates among English-speaking Hispanics and those with Medicaid insurance. Citation Format: Joshua Demb, Maria Elena Martinez, Scott Roesch, Samir Gupta, Valesca Largaespada, Sheila F. Castañeda, Borsika A. Rabin, Jennifer Covin, Kristine Ortwine, Yesenia Preciado-Hidalgo, Nicole Howard, James Schultz, Nannette Stamm, Daniel Ramirez, Michael T. Halpern, Jesse Nodora. Predictors of mailed fecal immunochemical test return for Hispanic patients receiving care at community health centers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl) nr A122.

S543 Exploring Reach of Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comparison of Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors Among Patients Completing Mailed FIT vs In-Clinic FIT

Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Completion in an Integrated Academic-Community Healthcare System

Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot

Uptake of colorectal cancer screening after mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach in a newly eligible 45–49-year-old community health center population

Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff

Cost Effectiveness of Mailed Outreach Programs for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Analysis of a Pragmatic, Randomized Trial

Program Components and Results From an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Using Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing

Yield and Effectiveness of 2-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer.

Comparative Performance of Common Fecal Immunochemical Tests : A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract A122: Predictors of mailed fecal immunochemical test return for Hispanic patients receiving care at community health centers

Challenges and Approaches to Measuring Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

FIT as a population-based and financially viable method to screen underserved patients for colorectal cancer.

The Reach of Calls and Text Messages for Mailed FIT Outreach in the PROMPT Stepped-wedge Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial

A Randomized Trial of Choice Architecture and Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in a Community Health Setting

The effect of mailed outreach on FIT completion among patients aged 45–50 in a safety net healthcare system

Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the Medicaid population

Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review

Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening: Maximizing Success by Minimizing Failure

Changes in the Choice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in Primary Care Settings from 7,845 Prospectively Collected Surveys

Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Death