Impact of Radiation Dose on Survival for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Yang Yang,Xiaofang Xu,Xia Zhou,Wuan Bao,Danhong Zhang,Feiying Gu,Xianghui Du,Qixun Chen,Guoqin Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01431
IF: 4.7
2020-08-20
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:<span><strong>Purpose:</strong> Radiation dose used in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) varies in different trials and clinical practice.<strong>Methods and Materials:</strong> Data from patients diagnosed with ESCC receiving NCRT followed by esophagectomy were retrospectively collected from February 2013 to December 2017. Lower dose (LD) radiotherapy was defined as ≤45 Gy, and &gt;45 Gy was considered as higher dose (HD). Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with long-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with survival.<strong>Results:</strong> A total of 118 patients treated with NCRT were included in our analysis: 62 patients received LD radiotherapy, and 56 patients received HD radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 24.3 months (0.67–65.3 m). Two-years overall survival (OS) rates were 75.0 and 79.0% in HD and LD group, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.360), and complete pathological remission (pCR) rates in two groups were 42.9 and 30.6%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.17). The incidences of toxic effects including post-operative complications were not significantly different between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor T stage, M1a disease, smoking history, and pCR rate were significantly associated with OS.<strong>Conclusions:</strong> In ESCC patients treated with NCRT followed by surgery, higher radiation dose was not significantly associated with a higher pCR rate and longer survival. Lower radiation dose might be a preferable time-dose fraction scheme. Our finding needs to be further validated by randomized trials.</span>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?