Motion and anatomy dual aware lung ventilation imaging by integrating Jacobian map and average CT image using dual path fusion network

Pei Ma,Zhi Chen,Yu‐Hua Huang,Mayang Zhao,Wen Li,Haojiang Li,Di Cao,Yi‐Quan Jiang,Ta Zhou,Jing Cai,Ge Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17466
IF: 4.506
2024-10-23
Medical Physics
Abstract:Background Deep learning‐based computed tomography (CT) ventilation imaging (CTVI) is a promising technique for guiding functional lung avoidance radiotherapy (FLART). However, conventional approaches, which rely on anatomical CT data, may overlook important ventilation features due to the lack of motion data integration. Purpose This study aims to develop a novel dual‐aware CTVI method that integrates both anatomical information from CT images and motional information from Jacobian maps to generate more accurate ventilation images for FLART. Methods A dataset of 66 patients with four‐dimensional CT (4DCT) images and reference ventilation images (RefVI) was utilized to develop the dual‐path fusion network (DPFN) for synthesizing ventilation images (CTVIDual). The DPFN model was specifically designed to integrate motion data from 4DCT‐generated Jacobian maps with anatomical data from average 4DCT images. The DPFN utilized two specialized feature extraction pathways, along with encoders and decoders, designed to handle both 3D average CT images and Jacobian map data. This dual‐processing approach enabled the comprehensive extraction of lung ventilation‐related features. The performance of DPFN was assessed by comparing CTVIDual to RefVI using various metrics, including Spearman's correlation coefficients (R), Dice similarity coefficients of high‐functional region (DSCh), and low‐functional region (DSCl). Additionally, CTVIDual was benchmarked against other CTVI methods, including a dual‐phase CT‐based deep learning method (CTVIDLCT), a radiomics‐based method (CTVIFM), a super voxel‐based method (CTVISVD), a Unet‐based method (CTVIUnet), and two deformable registration‐based methods (CTVIJac and CTVIHU). Results In the test group, the mean R between CTVIDual and RefVI was 0.70, significantly outperforming CTVIDLCT (0.68), CTVIFM (0.58), CTVISVD (0.62), and CTVIUnet (0.66), with p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?