Abstract:Importance For patients with atrial fibrillation, clinicians often prescribe antiplatelet therapy rather than oral anticoagulation, which may be related to a concern that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with a higher risk of intracranial bleeding, despite being less effective for stroke prevention. Objective To determine whether DOAC therapy, compared with single-agent antiplatelet therapy, was associated with an increased risk of intracranial and major hemorrhage. Data Sources A systematic search of PubMed and Embase databases from inception to February 7, 2024, was performed. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials that compared DOAC therapy with single-agent antiplatelet therapies were included. Trials with active follow-up of less than 30 days or a sample size less than 200 were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Data were extracted independently by 2 researchers. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to report pooled treatment effects and 95% CIs. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage. Results A total of 9 randomized clinical trials were included (45 494 participants). DOAC therapy was not associated with significantly higher odds of intracranial hemorrhage compared with antiplatelet therapy (0.55% vs 0.48% over a mean trial follow-up of 17.1 months; odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.71-1.88), but there was heterogeneity among trials ( I 2 = 53.7%). In an analysis by DOAC agent, the respective estimates for intracranial hemorrhage risk were as follows: rivaroxaban, OR, 2.09 (95% CI, 1.20-3.64); dabigatran, OR, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.61-1.64); and apixaban, OR, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.44-1.17). Overall, DOAC therapy was associated with higher odds of major hemorrhage compared with antiplatelet therapy (2.41% vs 1.76% over a mean trial follow-up of 15.5 months; OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.80), with the following estimates by agent: rivaroxaban, OR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.22-3.00); dabigatran; OR, 1.21 (95% CI, 0.86-1.69); and apixaban, OR, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.73-1.63). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, DOAC therapy was not associated with a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with antiplatelet therapy, but was associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage. These findings support the safety of DOAC compared with antiplatelet therapy with respect to risk of ICH and reinforce adherence with current atrial fibrillation guidelines.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Traditional Anticoagulation in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Updated Systematic Review

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin in the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With Valvular Heart Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Assessment of the efficiency and safety of anti-coagulation therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation

Comparison of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Left-Sided Bioprosthetic Heart Valves and Atrial Fibrillation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in adults with durable left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety of the direct-acting anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Agonists in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhosis: Rationale and current evidence

Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelet Therapy and Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Exhibit Lower Risks of Mortality and Bleeding Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in AF Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies

Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus

Comparing Efficacy and Safety Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Warfarin After Direct Oral Anticoagulant Failure

Effectiveness and Safety of Under or Over-dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 148909 Patients From 10 Real-World Studies

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Comparing Benefits and Harms Between Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

Assessing Safety of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Real-World Outcomes Study

An Updated Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: First Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies